Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 vs Meta: Muse Spark 1.1

Claude Opus 4.7 (medium) leads on average score with 8.7 vs 8.1. Claude Opus 4.7 (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $1.477 vs $1.694. Claude Opus 4.7 (medium) is faster at 7.61s vs 31.49s, with pass rates of 83.3% vs 69.7%.

Recommended modelClaude Opus 4.7 (medium)It has the best score here (8.7), while responding about 4.1x faster than Muse Spark 1.1 (high).

Last updated at: 2026-07-21

Metric Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 medium Release: 2026-04-16 Muse Spark 1.1 Muse Spark 1.1 high Release: 2026-07-16
Score 8.7 8.1
Rank #18 #30
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.6 7.9
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 83.3% 69.7%
Flaky tests 1 6
Total Runs 66 64
Cost per result 8.201 14.116
Total Cost $1.477 $1.694
Input Price $5.000 / 1M $1.250 / 1M
Output Price $25.000 / 1M $4.250 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 145,252 129,423
Output Tokens 24,948 8,077
Reasoning Tokens 5,042 352,421
Response Time (avg) 7.61s 31.49s
Response Time (max) 65.40s 196.03s
Response Time (total) 159.91s 661.28s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#18 Claude Opus 4.7

medium
Cost
$0.059
Time
26.8s
Tokens
2,475 tok

#30 Muse Spark 1.1

high
Cost
$0.039
Time
50.1s
Tokens
9,423 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Opus 4.7 7.6 7.2 77.8% 1 12.96s 10,635 7,629 1,114
Muse Spark 1.1 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 22.92s 8,562 349 36,039

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair