Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 vs xAI: Grok 4.5

Grok 4.5 (high) leads on average score with 8.9 vs 8.7. Claude Opus 4.7 (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $1.477 vs $1.707. Claude Opus 4.7 (medium) is faster at 7.61s vs 76.50s, with pass rates of 83.3% vs 83.3%.

Recommended modelClaude Opus 4.7 (medium)Its score stays close to the best score here (8.7 vs 8.9), while responding about 10.0x faster than Grok 4.5 (high).

Last updated at: 2026-07-17

Metric Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 medium Release: 2026-04-16 Grok 4.5 Grok 4.5 high Release: 2026-07-08
Score 8.7 8.9
Rank #15 #12
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.6 9.2
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 83.3% 83.3%
Flaky tests 1 2
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 8.201 10.041
Total Cost $1.477 $1.707
Input Price $5.000 / 1M $2.000 / 1M
Output Price $25.000 / 1M $6.000 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 145,252 151,562
Output Tokens 24,948 5,655
Reasoning Tokens 5,042 247,540
Response Time (avg) 7.61s 76.50s
Response Time (max) 65.40s 676.83s
Response Time (total) 159.91s 1683.07s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#15 Claude Opus 4.7

medium
Cost
$0.059
Time
26.8s
Tokens
2,475 tok

#12 xAI: Grok 4.5

high
Cost
$0.015
Time
29.7s
Tokens
2,737 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Opus 4.7 7.6 7.2 77.8% 1 12.96s 10,635 7,629 1,114
Grok 4.5 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 155.16s 9,579 357 100,752

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair