Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 vs Claude Opus 5

Claude Opus 4.7 (medium) leads on average score with 8.7 vs 8.6. Claude Opus 5 (low) has the lower benchmark cost at $1.121 vs $1.477. Claude Opus 5 (low) is faster at 6.99s vs 7.61s, with pass rates of 83.3% vs 80.3%.

Recommended modelClaude Opus 5 (low)It offers the best overall trade-off: a competitive score (8.6), lower cost than Claude Opus 4.7 (medium), and balanced response time.

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Metric Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 medium Release: 2026-04-16 Claude Opus 5 Claude Opus 5 low Release: 2026-07-25
Score 8.7 8.6
Rank #20 #23
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.6 9.3
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 83.3% 80.3%
Flaky tests 1 2
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 8.201 6.593
Total Cost $1.477 $1.121
Input Price $5.000 / 1M $5.000 / 1M
Output Price $25.000 / 1M $25.000 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 145,252 134,773
Output Tokens 24,948 14,123
Reasoning Tokens 5,042 3,896
Response Time (avg) 7.61s 6.99s
Response Time (max) 65.40s 30.67s
Response Time (total) 159.91s 153.73s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#20 Claude Opus 4.7

medium
Cost
$0.059
Time
26.8s
Tokens
2,475 tok

#23 Claude Opus 5

low
Cost
$0.062
Time
30.2s
Tokens
2,615 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Opus 4.7 7.6 7.2 77.8% 1 12.96s 10,635 7,629 1,114
Claude Opus 5 7.8 7.4 77.8% 1 6.70s 10,590 2,442 760

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair