Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Anthropic: Claude Fable 5 vs Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7

Claude Opus 4.7 (medium) leads on average score with 8.7 vs 8.6. Claude Opus 4.7 (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $1.477 vs $3.478. Claude Opus 4.7 (medium) is faster at 7.61s vs 17.20s, with pass rates of 78.8% vs 83.3%.

Recommended modelClaude Opus 4.7 (medium)It has the best score here (8.7), while costing about 2.4x less than Claude Fable 5 (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Metric Claude Fable 5 Claude Fable 5 medium Release: 2026-06-10 Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 medium Release: 2026-04-16
Score 8.6 8.7
Rank #22 #20
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.6 9.6
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 78.8% 83.3%
Flaky tests 1 1
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 20.459 8.201
Total Cost $3.478 $1.477
Input Price $10.000 / 1M $5.000 / 1M
Output Price $50.000 / 1M $25.000 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 89,643 145,252
Output Tokens 41,360 24,948
Reasoning Tokens 10,269 5,042
Response Time (avg) 17.20s 7.61s
Response Time (max) 80.80s 65.40s
Response Time (total) 378.41s 159.91s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#22 Claude Fable 5

medium
Cost
$0.606
Time
156.7s
Tokens
12,264 tok

#20 Claude Opus 4.7

medium
Cost
$0.059
Time
26.8s
Tokens
2,475 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Fable 5 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 15.59s 10,590 7,383 1,318
Claude Opus 4.7 7.6 7.2 77.8% 1 12.96s 10,635 7,629 1,114

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair