领域专项 排名
看看哪些 AI 模型在 领域专项 上表现最好，哪些更稳定，以及差距主要出现在哪里。 排序方式: 指标 ↑.
316/316
筛选模型
没有模型匹配当前搜索和筛选条件。
| 排名 | 模型 | 公司 | 领域专项 得分 | 分数 | 总成本 | 测试正确 | 响应时间（平均） |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #217 | Nemotron 3 Super medium | NVIDIA | 2.9 | 5.7 | $0.050 | 0/3 | 19.4s |
| #232 | Nemotron 3.5 Lightning high | NVIDIA | 2.9 | 5.6 | $0.134 | 0/3 | 88.6s |
| #255 | Nemotron 3.5 Lightning medium | NVIDIA | 2.9 | 5.1 | $0.156 | 0/3 | 74.7s |
| #285 | Cobuddy medium | Baidu | 2.9 | 4.7 | $0.000 | 0/3 | 128.2s |
| #21 | Claude Opus 5 medium | Anthropic | 2.9 | 9.2 | $1.586 | 0/3 | 26.3s |
| #23 | Seed 2.1 Turbo low | Bytedance Seed | 2.9 | 9.1 | $1.546 | 0/3 | 424.5s |
| #31 | Muse Spark 1.3 high | Meta | 2.9 | 8.9 | $1.653 | 0/3 | 174.6s |
| #32 | Seed 2.1 Turbo high | Bytedance Seed | 2.9 | 8.9 | $1.797 | 0/3 | 506.2s |
| #46 | Qwen3.8 Max low | Qwen | 2.9 | 8.6 | $0.702 | 0/3 | 40.1s |
| #51 | Grok 4.5 low | X AI | 2.9 | 8.4 | $0.945 | 0/3 | 77.1s |
| #63 | Muse Glimmer 30B xhigh | Meta | 2.9 | 8.1 | $0.471 | 0/3 | 142.6s |
| #76 | Qwen3.6 Plus medium | Qwen | 2.9 | 7.8 | $0.418 | 0/3 | 46.4s |
| #98 | GPT 5.3 Chat none | OpenAI | 2.9 | 7.5 | $0.533 | 0/3 | 12.7s |
| #103 | Grok Build 0.1 medium | X AI | 2.9 | 7.5 | $1.130 | 0/3 | 175.9s |
| #108 | GPT-5.6 Luna medium | OpenAI | 2.9 | 7.4 | $0.072 | 0/3 | 18.5s |