领域专项 排名
看看哪些 AI 模型在 领域专项 上表现最好，哪些更稳定，以及差距主要出现在哪里。 排序方式: 总成本 ↑.
316/316
筛选模型
没有模型匹配当前搜索和筛选条件。
| 排名 | 模型 | 公司 | 领域专项 得分 | 分数 | 总成本 | 测试正确 | 响应时间（平均） |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #306 | Ling 3.0 Tiny high | Inclusionai | 2.9 | 3.8 | $0.000 | 0/3 | 70.1s |
| #307 | Ling 3.0 Tiny low | Inclusionai | 3.0 | 3.8 | $0.000 | 0/3 | 72.1s |
| #310 | Ling 3.0 Tiny medium | Inclusionai | 3.0 | 3.8 | $0.000 | 0/3 | 81.4s |
| #313 | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30b A3b Reasoning medium | NVIDIA | 2.9 | 3.4 | $0.000 | 0/3 | 56.7s |
| #314 | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30b A3b Reasoning none | NVIDIA | 3.6 | 3.2 | $0.000 | 0/3 | 489ms |
| #316 | LFM2-24B-A2B none | Liquid | 5.9 | 2.2 | $0.001 | 1/3 | 287ms |
| #271 | Ling-2.6-flash none | Inclusionai | 3.0 | 4.9 | $0.002 | 0/3 | 5.20s |
| #220 | Ling-3.0-flash none | Inclusionai | 3.0 | 5.7 | $0.004 | 0/3 | 840ms |
| #311 | Laguna Xs.2 none | Poolside | 5.3 | 3.8 | $0.004 | 1/3 | 371ms |
| #215 | Solar Pro 4 none | Upstage | 2.9 | 5.8 | $0.006 | 0/3 | 4.65s |
| #236 | Qwen3.8 27B none | Qwen | 7.7 | 5.5 | ~$0.006 | 2/3 | 552ms |
| #303 | Granite 4.1 8B none | IBM Granite | 3.0 | 4.0 | $0.007 | 0/3 | 287ms |
| #304 | Nemotron 3.5 Lightning none | NVIDIA | 3.0 | 4.0 | $0.007 | 0/3 | 683ms |
| #300 | Hy3 preview none | Tencent | 3.6 | 4.0 | $0.007 | 0/3 | 17.6s |
| #247 | Laguna XS 2.1 none | Poolside | 5.3 | 5.3 | $0.008 | 1/3 | 303ms |