数据解析与提取 排名
看看哪些 AI 模型在 数据解析与提取 上表现最好，哪些更稳定，以及差距主要出现在哪里。 排序方式: 响应时间（平均） ↓.
442/442
筛选模型
没有模型匹配当前搜索和筛选条件。
| 排名 | 模型 | 公司 | 数据解析与提取 得分 | 分数 | 总成本 | 测试正确 | 响应时间（平均） |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #292 | Trinity Large Thinking high | Arcee AI | 0.6 | 0.6 | $0.794 | 1/2 | 14.0s |
| #236 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 medium | Anthropic | 1.0 | 0.6 | $2.126 | 2/2 | 13.9s |
| #120 | Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B high | Qwen | 1.0 | 0.8 | $2.949 | 2/2 | 13.7s |
| #69 | GPT-6 Sol low | OpenAI | 1.0 | 0.9 | $0.477 | 2/2 | 13.6s |
| #100 | GLM 5.2 medium | Z.ai | 1.0 | 0.8 | $1.007 | 2/2 | 13.4s |
| #268 | Apodex 1.1 Mini low | Apodex | 1.0 | 0.6 | $0.000 | 2/2 | 13.0s |
| #223 | Qwen3.6 35B A3B medium | Qwen | 1.0 | 0.7 | $0.834 | 2/2 | 13.0s |
| #242 | Dots 3 Note Preview high | Dots Studio | 0.7 | 0.6 | $0.000 | 1/2 | 12.7s |
| #31 | Claude Opus 5.5 medium | Anthropic | 1.0 | 0.9 | $1.804 | 2/2 | 12.7s |
| #83 | GPT-5 Mini medium | OpenAI | 1.0 | 0.8 | $0.315 | 2/2 | 12.6s |
| #412 | Xing4.0 29b A4b none | Xingchen AGI | 0.3 | 0.3 | $0.000 | 0/2 | 12.3s |
| #25 | Claude Opus 5.5 high | Anthropic | 1.0 | 0.9 | $2.133 | 2/2 | 12.3s |
| #95 | Claude Opus 4.8 medium | Anthropic | 0.7 | 0.8 | $3.490 | 1/2 | 12.3s |
| #308 | Ling 3.1 Flash none | Inclusionai | 1.0 | 0.5 | $0.000 | 2/2 | 12.3s |
| #183 | Kimi K2.7 Code medium | Moonshot AI | 1.0 | 0.7 | $1.136 | 2/2 | 12.3s |