数据解析与提取 排名
看看哪些 AI 模型在 数据解析与提取 上表现最好，哪些更稳定，以及差距主要出现在哪里。 排序方式: 总成本 ↑.
442/442
筛选模型
没有模型匹配当前搜索和筛选条件。
| 排名 | 模型 | 公司 | 数据解析与提取 得分 | 分数 | 总成本 | 测试正确 | 响应时间（平均） |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #298 | Gemma 4 31B none | 1.0 | 0.6 | $0.031 | 2/2 | 2.25s | |
| #141 | GPT-6 Luna low | OpenAI | 1.0 | 0.8 | $0.033 | 2/2 | 9.94s |
| #394 | Laguna M.1 medium | Poolside | 1.0 | 0.4 | $0.033 | 2/2 | 4.93s |
| #382 | Mercury 2 none | Inception | 0.7 | 0.4 | $0.033 | 1/2 | 667ms |
| #239 | Mercury 2.5 medium | Inception | 1.0 | 0.6 | $0.034 | 2/2 | 2.57s |
| #323 | Granite 4.2 8B low | IBM Granite | 0.7 | 0.5 | $0.036 | 1/2 | 1.39s |
| #380 | Granite 4.2 8B none | IBM Granite | 0.3 | 0.4 | $0.037 | 0/2 | 1.05s |
| #213 | GLM 5.3 Flash low | Z.ai | 0.6 | 0.7 | $0.038 | 1/2 | 2.39s |
| #199 | Mercury 2.5 Preview medium | Inception | 1.0 | 0.7 | $0.039 | 2/2 | 2.77s |
| #224 | Mercury 2.5 Preview high | Inception | 1.0 | 0.6 | $0.040 | 2/2 | 2.24s |
| #305 | Nemotron 3.5 Super VL none | NVIDIA | 1.0 | 0.6 | $0.040 | 2/2 | 4.49s |
| #353 | Qwen3.5-9B none | Qwen | 1.0 | 0.5 | $0.041 | 2/2 | 847ms |
| #322 | GPT-5.6 Luna none | OpenAI | 1.0 | 0.5 | $0.042 | 2/2 | 758ms |
| #374 | Hy3 preview low | Tencent | 0.7 | 0.5 | $0.042 | 1/2 | 5.85s |
| #333 | MiMo-V2-Flash medium | Xiaomi | 0.7 | 0.5 | $0.043 | 1/2 | 0ms |