数据解析与提取 排名
看看哪些 AI 模型在 数据解析与提取 上表现最好，哪些更稳定，以及差距主要出现在哪里。 排序方式: 响应时间（平均） ↑.
451/451
筛选模型
没有模型匹配当前搜索和筛选条件。
| 排名 | 模型 | 公司 | 数据解析与提取 得分 | 分数 | 总成本 | 测试正确 | 响应时间（平均） |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #121 | Gemini 3.5 Flash medium | 1.0 | 0.8 | $1.316 | 2/2 | 4.07s | |
| #279 | Step 5 Preview medium | Stepfun | 1.0 | 0.6 | $4.136 | 2/2 | 4.10s |
| #439 | Classify-1 default | Scaledown | 0.7 | 0.2 | $0.008 | 1/2 | 4.10s |
| #235 | KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 high | Kwaipilot | 1.0 | 0.6 | $0.506 | 2/2 | 4.13s |
| #408 | Ling 3.0 Tiny high | Inclusionai | 0.3 | 0.4 | $0.000 | 0/2 | 4.16s |
| #266 | Grok 4.20 medium | X AI | 1.0 | 0.6 | $1.246 | 2/2 | 4.17s |
| #193 | Muse Glimmer 30B low | Meta | 1.0 | 0.7 | $0.219 | 2/2 | 4.17s |
| #33 | GPT-5.5 medium | OpenAI | 1.0 | 0.9 | $4.809 | 2/2 | 4.18s |
| #63 | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash high | DeepSeek | 0.7 | 0.9 | $0.617 | 1/2 | 4.19s |
| #226 | KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 low | Kwaipilot | 1.0 | 0.7 | $0.568 | 2/2 | 4.19s |
| #27 | Claude Opus 5 high | Anthropic | 1.0 | 0.9 | $4.524 | 2/2 | 4.22s |
| #65 | Muse Spark 1.2 low | Meta | 1.0 | 0.9 | $0.881 | 2/2 | 4.22s |
| #41 | Muse Wonder low | Meta | 1.0 | 0.9 | $2.637 | 2/2 | 4.27s |
| #153 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 low | DeepSeek | 1.0 | 0.7 | $0.306 | 2/2 | 4.35s |
| #410 | Ling 3.0 Tiny medium | Inclusionai | 0.3 | 0.4 | $0.000 | 0/2 | 4.41s |