数据解析与提取 排名
看看哪些 AI 模型在 数据解析与提取 上表现最好，哪些更稳定，以及差距主要出现在哪里。 排序方式: 指标 ↑.
442/442
筛选模型
没有模型匹配当前搜索和筛选条件。
| 排名 | 模型 | 公司 | 数据解析与提取 得分 | 分数 | 总成本 | 测试正确 | 响应时间（平均） |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #54 | Muse Spark 1.2 high | Meta | 1.0 | 0.9 | $2.018 | 2/2 | 6.93s |
| #55 | Muse Spark 1.2 medium | Meta | 1.0 | 0.9 | $1.590 | 2/2 | 6.42s |
| #56 | Muse Spark 1.1 medium | Meta | 1.0 | 0.9 | $1.665 | 2/2 | 4.96s |
| #57 | Claude Fable 5 medium | Anthropic | 1.0 | 0.9 | $5.089 | 2/2 | 7.18s |
| #58 | Pareto 26.9 default | Unbiased | 1.0 | 0.9 | $1.864 | 2/2 | 2.63s |
| #59 | Qwen3.8 MAX low | Qwen | 1.0 | 0.9 | $1.089 | 2/2 | 7.87s |
| #60 | GPT-5.4 medium | OpenAI | 1.0 | 0.9 | $2.213 | 2/2 | 5.32s |
| #61 | Muse Spark Open medium | Meta | 1.0 | 0.9 | $1.260 | 2/2 | 10.7s |
| #64 | Muse Spark 1.2 low | Meta | 1.0 | 0.9 | $0.881 | 2/2 | 4.22s |
| #65 | GPT-5.2 medium | OpenAI | 1.0 | 0.9 | $1.558 | 2/2 | 3.15s |
| #66 | Qwen3.8 27B high | Qwen | 1.0 | 0.9 | ~$0.298 | 2/2 | 34.9s |
| #67 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro medium | Xiaomi | 1.0 | 0.9 | $0.586 | 2/2 | 2.71s |
| #68 | Seed 2.1 Turbo medium | Bytedance Seed | 1.0 | 0.9 | $2.042 | 2/2 | 37.8s |
| #69 | GPT-6 Sol low | OpenAI | 1.0 | 0.9 | $0.477 | 2/2 | 13.6s |
| #71 | Muse Spark 1.1 low | Meta | 1.0 | 0.9 | $0.885 | 2/2 | 3.22s |