Urambazaji
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Qwen: Qwen3.5-27B vs Z.ai: GLM 5.2

GLM 5.2 inaongoza kwa average score: 6.6 vs 6.5. GLM 5.2 ina gharama ya chini ya benchmark: $0.047 vs $0.090. Qwen3.5-27B ni ya haraka zaidi: 4.76s vs 9.34s, na pass rates 40.9% vs 59.1%.

Muundo unaopendekezwaQwen3.5-27BIts score stays close to the best score here (6.5 vs 6.6), while responding about 2.0x faster than GLM 5.2.

Benchmark zimetengenezwa kutoka seti za majaribio za AI BENCHY tarehe: 2026-07-18

Kipimo Qwen3.5-27B Qwen3.5-27B none Toleo: 2026-02-24 GLM 5.2 GLM 5.2 none Toleo: 2026-06-17
Alama 6.5 6.6
Nafasi #100 #94
Uaminifu 10.0 10.0
Uthabiti 9.3 9.2
Majaribio sahihi
Kiwango cha kupita kwa kila jaribio 40.9% 59.1%
Majaribio yasiyo thabiti 2 2
Jumla ya uendeshaji 66 64
Gharama kwa matokeo 0.763 1.421
Jumla ya gharama $0.090 $0.047
Bei ya ingizo $0.260 / 1M $0.293 / 1M
Bei ya toleo $2.600 / 1M $0.920 / 1M
Jumla ya tokeni za ingizo 102,316 112,359
Tokeni za matokeo 24,321 14,340
Tokeni za hoja 0 0
Muda wa majibu (wastani) 4.76s 9.34s
Muda wa majibu (upeo) 69.46s 79.65s
Muda wa majibu (jumla) 104.71s 205.46s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#100 Qwen3.5-27B

none
Gharama
$0.007
Muda
42.9s
Tokeni
4,273 tok

#94 GLM 5.2

none
SVG batili
Gharama
$0.033
Muda
87.7s
Tokeni
7,455 tok

Modeli bora kwa alama

Alama dhidi ya gharama ya jumla

Muda wa majibu (wastani)

Alama vs Muda wa majibu (wastani)

Jumla ya tokeni za matokeo

Alama vs Jumla ya tokeni za matokeo

Mgawanyo wa kategoria

Uandishi wa msimbo Alama Uthabiti Kiwango cha kupita kwa kila jaribio Majaribio yasiyo thabiti Majaribio sahihi Muda wa majibu (wastani) Tokeni za ingizo Tokeni za matokeo Tokeni za hoja
Qwen3.5-27B 5.8 10.0 33.3% 0 1.80s 7,913 415 0
GLM 5.2 3.7 9.5 0.0% 0 7.55s 7,263 1,958 0

Ulinganisho wa haraka

Badilisha jozi ya ulinganisho