Urambazaji
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Qwen: Qwen3.6 27B vs Z.ai: GLM 5.2

GLM 5.2 inaongoza kwa average score: 6.6 vs 6.5. GLM 5.2 ina gharama ya chini ya benchmark: $0.145 vs $0.779. GLM 5.2 ni ya haraka zaidi: 9.34s vs 106.32s, na pass rates 59.1% vs 59.1%.

Muundo unaopendekezwaGLM 5.2It has the best score here (6.6), while costing about 5.4x less than Qwen3.6 27B (medium).

Benchmark zimetengenezwa kutoka seti za majaribio za AI BENCHY tarehe: 2026-07-17

Kipimo Qwen3.6 27B Qwen3.6 27B medium Toleo: 2026-04-20 GLM 5.2 GLM 5.2 none Toleo: 2026-06-17
Alama 6.5 6.6
Nafasi #94 #92
Uaminifu 10.0 10.0
Uthabiti 8.0 9.2
Majaribio sahihi
Kiwango cha kupita kwa kila jaribio 59.1% 59.1%
Majaribio yasiyo thabiti 6 2
Jumla ya uendeshaji 66 64
Gharama kwa matokeo 7.319 1.421
Jumla ya gharama $0.779 $0.145
Bei ya ingizo $0.450 / 1M $0.919 / 1M
Bei ya toleo $2.700 / 1M $2.887 / 1M
Jumla ya tokeni za ingizo 106,167 112,359
Tokeni za matokeo 32,889 14,340
Tokeni za hoja 241,303 0
Muda wa majibu (wastani) 106.32s 9.34s
Muda wa majibu (upeo) 1085.11s 79.65s
Muda wa majibu (jumla) 2339.12s 205.46s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#94 Qwen3.6 27B

medium
Gharama
$0.009
Muda
39.6s
Tokeni
3,090 tok

#92 GLM 5.2

none
SVG batili
Gharama
$0.033
Muda
87.7s
Tokeni
7,455 tok

Modeli bora kwa alama

Alama dhidi ya gharama ya jumla

Muda wa majibu (wastani)

Alama vs Muda wa majibu (wastani)

Jumla ya tokeni za matokeo

Alama vs Jumla ya tokeni za matokeo

Mgawanyo wa kategoria

Uandishi wa msimbo Alama Uthabiti Kiwango cha kupita kwa kila jaribio Majaribio yasiyo thabiti Majaribio sahihi Muda wa majibu (wastani) Tokeni za ingizo Tokeni za matokeo Tokeni za hoja
Qwen3.6 27B 7.7 10.0 66.7% 0 142.99s 5,051 7,968 43,367
GLM 5.2 3.7 9.5 0.0% 0 7.55s 7,263 1,958 0

Ulinganisho wa haraka

Badilisha jozi ya ulinganisho