Urambazaji
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Meituan: LongCat 2.0 vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-27B

Qwen3.5-27B inaongoza kwa average score: 6.5 vs 6.3. LongCat 2.0 ina gharama ya chini ya benchmark: $0.044 vs $0.090. Qwen3.5-27B ni ya haraka zaidi: 4.76s vs 5.18s, na pass rates 36.4% vs 40.9%.

Muundo unaopendekezwaQwen3.5-27BIt has the strongest score in this comparison (6.5) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across all 2 models.

Benchmark zimetengenezwa kutoka seti za majaribio za AI BENCHY tarehe: 2026-07-20

Kipimo LongCat 2.0 LongCat 2.0 none Toleo: 2026-07-20 Qwen3.5-27B Qwen3.5-27B none Toleo: 2026-02-24
Alama 6.3 6.5
Nafasi #111 #103
Uaminifu 10.0 10.0
Uthabiti 9.3 9.3
Majaribio sahihi
Kiwango cha kupita kwa kila jaribio 36.4% 40.9%
Majaribio yasiyo thabiti 2 2
Jumla ya uendeshaji 66 66
Gharama kwa matokeo 0.627 0.763
Jumla ya gharama $0.044 $0.090
Bei ya ingizo $0.300 / 1M $0.260 / 1M
Bei ya toleo $1.200 / 1M $2.600 / 1M
Jumla ya tokeni za ingizo 108,743 102,316
Tokeni za matokeo 9,372 24,321
Tokeni za hoja 0 0
Muda wa majibu (wastani) 5.18s 4.76s
Muda wa majibu (upeo) 48.38s 69.46s
Muda wa majibu (jumla) 113.95s 104.71s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#111 LongCat 2.0

none
Gharama
$0.027
Muda
411.7s
Tokeni
22,283 tok

#103 Qwen3.5-27B

none
Gharama
$0.007
Muda
42.9s
Tokeni
4,273 tok

Modeli bora kwa alama

Alama dhidi ya gharama ya jumla

Muda wa majibu (wastani)

Alama vs Muda wa majibu (wastani)

Jumla ya tokeni za matokeo

Alama vs Jumla ya tokeni za matokeo

Mgawanyo wa kategoria

Uandishi wa msimbo Alama Uthabiti Kiwango cha kupita kwa kila jaribio Majaribio yasiyo thabiti Majaribio sahihi Muda wa majibu (wastani) Tokeni za ingizo Tokeni za matokeo Tokeni za hoja
LongCat 2.0 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 2.85s 7,446 578 0
Qwen3.5-27B 5.8 10.0 33.3% 0 1.80s 7,913 415 0

Ulinganisho wa haraka

Badilisha jozi ya ulinganisho