Urambazaji
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Ling 3.0 Flash vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-Flash

Ling 3.0 Flash (high) inaongoza kwa average score: 6.4 vs 6.2. Ling 3.0 Flash (high) ina gharama ya chini ya benchmark: $0.000 vs $0.139. Ling 3.0 Flash (high) ni ya haraka zaidi: 13.32s vs 84.82s, na pass rates 63.6% vs 69.7%.

Muundo unaopendekezwaLing 3.0 Flash (high)It has the best score here (6.4), while responding about 6.4x faster than Qwen3.5-Flash (medium).

Benchmark zimetengenezwa kutoka seti za majaribio za AI BENCHY tarehe: 2026-07-24

Kipimo Ling 3.0 Flash Ling 3.0 Flash high Toleo: 2026-07-24 Inapatikana bure Qwen3.5-Flash Qwen3.5-Flash medium Toleo: 2026-02-24
Alama 6.4 6.2
Nafasi #114 #121
Uaminifu 9.4 10.0
Uthabiti 8.6 7.8
Majaribio sahihi
Kiwango cha kupita kwa kila jaribio 63.6% 69.7%
Majaribio yasiyo thabiti 4 6
Jumla ya uendeshaji 66 66
Gharama kwa matokeo 0.000 1.361
Jumla ya gharama $0.000 $0.139
Bei ya ingizo $0.000 / 1M $0.065 / 1M
Bei ya toleo $0.000 / 1M $0.260 / 1M
Jumla ya tokeni za ingizo 132,224 118,499
Tokeni za matokeo 92,393 12,284
Tokeni za hoja 211,994 490,610
Muda wa majibu (wastani) 13.32s 84.82s
Muda wa majibu (upeo) 75.27s 515.38s
Muda wa majibu (jumla) 292.99s 1781.22s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#114 Ling 3.0 Flash

high
Gharama
$0.000
Muda
30.7s
Tokeni
10,576 tok

#121 Qwen3.5-Flash

medium
Gharama
$0.002
Muda
25.8s
Tokeni
4,294 tok

Modeli bora kwa alama

Alama dhidi ya gharama ya jumla

Muda wa majibu (wastani)

Alama vs Muda wa majibu (wastani)

Jumla ya tokeni za matokeo

Alama vs Jumla ya tokeni za matokeo

Mgawanyo wa kategoria

Uandishi wa msimbo Alama Uthabiti Kiwango cha kupita kwa kila jaribio Majaribio yasiyo thabiti Majaribio sahihi Muda wa majibu (wastani) Tokeni za ingizo Tokeni za matokeo Tokeni za hoja
Ling 3.0 Flash 6.7 5.0 66.7% 2 14.85s 8,298 15,602 32,152
Qwen3.5-Flash 3.7 7.2 22.2% 1 58.87s 6,685 302 90,081

Ulinganisho wa haraka

Badilisha jozi ya ulinganisho