Urambazaji
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Z.ai: GLM 5.1

average score iko karibu sawa: 5.6 vs 5.5. DeepSeek V4 Flash ina gharama ya chini ya benchmark: $0.044 vs $0.164. GLM 5.1 ni ya haraka zaidi: 6.70s vs 36.78s, na pass rates 31.8% vs 40.9%.

Muundo unaopendekezwaDeepSeek V4 FlashIt has the best score here (5.6), while costing about 3.8x less than GLM 5.1.

Benchmark zimetengenezwa kutoka seti za majaribio za AI BENCHY tarehe: 2026-07-22

Kipimo DeepSeek V4 Flash DeepSeek V4 Flash none Toleo: 2026-04-24 GLM 5.1 GLM 5.1 none Toleo: 2026-04-07
Alama 5.6 5.5
Nafasi #156 #157
Uaminifu 10.0 10.0
Uthabiti 8.5 8.2
Majaribio sahihi
Kiwango cha kupita kwa kila jaribio 31.8% 40.9%
Majaribio yasiyo thabiti 4 5
Jumla ya uendeshaji 66 66
Gharama kwa matokeo 0.917 2.368
Jumla ya gharama $0.044 $0.164
Bei ya ingizo $0.098 / 1M $0.966 / 1M
Bei ya toleo $0.196 / 1M $3.036 / 1M
Jumla ya tokeni za ingizo 240,221 124,209
Tokeni za matokeo 100,727 14,393
Tokeni za hoja 0 0
Muda wa majibu (wastani) 36.78s 6.70s
Muda wa majibu (upeo) 247.27s 61.20s
Muda wa majibu (jumla) 809.09s 147.38s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#156 DeepSeek V4 Flash

none
Gharama
$0.004
Muda
157.6s
Tokeni
11,297 tok

#157 GLM 5.1

none
SVG batili
Gharama
$0.000
Muda
300.0s
Tokeni
0 tok

Modeli bora kwa alama

Alama dhidi ya gharama ya jumla

Muda wa majibu (wastani)

Alama vs Muda wa majibu (wastani)

Jumla ya tokeni za matokeo

Alama vs Jumla ya tokeni za matokeo

Mgawanyo wa kategoria

Uandishi wa msimbo Alama Uthabiti Kiwango cha kupita kwa kila jaribio Majaribio yasiyo thabiti Majaribio sahihi Muda wa majibu (wastani) Tokeni za ingizo Tokeni za matokeo Tokeni za hoja
DeepSeek V4 Flash 4.2 7.4 11.1% 1 17.13s 7,279 9,717 0
GLM 5.1 3.9 9.7 0.0% 0 4.96s 7,256 525 0

Ulinganisho wa haraka

Badilisha jozi ya ulinganisho