Urambazaji
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

AI BENCHY Compare

Kwaipilot: KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.1

Muhtasari

KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 (high) inaongoza kwa average score: 5.6 vs 5.5. KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 (high) ina gharama ya chini ya benchmark: $0.077 vs $0.164. GLM 5.1 ni ya haraka zaidi: 6.70s vs 15.90s, na pass rates 43.9% vs 40.9%.

Muundo unaopendekezwaKAT-Coder-Air V2.5 (high)It has the best score here (5.6), while costing about 2.1x less than GLM 5.1.

Benchmark zimetengenezwa kutoka seti za majaribio za AI BENCHY tarehe: 2026-07-17

Kipimo KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 high Toleo: 2026-07-14 GLM 5.1 GLM 5.1 none Toleo: 2026-04-07
Alama 5.6 5.5
Nafasi #137 #144
Uaminifu 9.9 10.0
Uthabiti 7.7 8.2
Majaribio sahihi
Kiwango cha kupita kwa kila jaribio 43.9% 40.9%
Majaribio yasiyo thabiti 6 5
Jumla ya uendeshaji 66 66
Gharama kwa matokeo 1.097 2.368
Jumla ya gharama $0.077 $0.164
Bei ya ingizo $0.150 / 1M $0.966 / 1M
Bei ya toleo $0.600 / 1M $3.036 / 1M
Jumla ya tokeni za ingizo 50,470 124,209
Tokeni za matokeo 3,957 14,393
Tokeni za hoja 111,374 0
Muda wa majibu (wastani) 15.90s 6.70s
Muda wa majibu (upeo) 118.35s 61.20s
Muda wa majibu (jumla) 349.71s 147.38s

Onyesho la kizazi

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#137 KAT-Coder-Air V2.5

high
SVG batili
Gharama
$0.000
Muda
300.0s
Tokeni
0 tok

#144 GLM 5.1

none
SVG batili
Gharama
$0.000
Muda
300.0s
Tokeni
0 tok

Modeli bora kwa alama

Alama dhidi ya gharama ya jumla

Muda wa majibu (wastani)

Alama vs Muda wa majibu (wastani)

Jumla ya tokeni za matokeo

Alama vs Jumla ya tokeni za matokeo

Mgawanyo wa kategoria

Uandishi wa msimbo Alama Uthabiti Kiwango cha kupita kwa kila jaribio Majaribio yasiyo thabiti Majaribio sahihi Muda wa majibu (wastani) Tokeni za ingizo Tokeni za matokeo Tokeni za hoja
KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 4.3 7.3 11.1% 1 39.07s 6,948 1,166 55,883
GLM 5.1 3.9 9.7 0.0% 0 4.96s 7,256 525 0

Ulinganisho wa haraka

Badilisha jozi ya ulinganisho