Urambazaji
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Poolside: Laguna S 2.1 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.1

GLM 5.1 inaongoza kwa average score: 5.5 vs 5.4. Laguna S 2.1 (high) ina gharama ya chini ya benchmark: $0.127 vs $0.164. GLM 5.1 ni ya haraka zaidi: 6.70s vs 111.61s, na pass rates 27.3% vs 40.9%.

Muundo unaopendekezwaGLM 5.1It has the best score here (5.5), while responding about 16.7x faster than Laguna S 2.1 (high).

Benchmark zimetengenezwa kutoka seti za majaribio za AI BENCHY tarehe: 2026-07-22

Kipimo Laguna S 2.1 Laguna S 2.1 high Toleo: 2026-07-21 Inapatikana bure GLM 5.1 GLM 5.1 none Toleo: 2026-04-07
Alama 5.4 5.5
Nafasi #167 #157
Uaminifu 9.9 10.0
Uthabiti 8.1 8.2
Majaribio sahihi
Kiwango cha kupita kwa kila jaribio 27.3% 40.9%
Majaribio yasiyo thabiti 5 5
Jumla ya uendeshaji 66 66
Gharama kwa matokeo 3.153 2.368
Jumla ya gharama $0.127 $0.164
Bei ya ingizo $0.100 / 1M $0.966 / 1M
Bei ya toleo $0.200 / 1M $3.036 / 1M
Jumla ya tokeni za ingizo 208,931 124,209
Tokeni za matokeo 175,588 14,393
Tokeni za hoja 409,276 0
Muda wa majibu (wastani) 111.61s 6.70s
Muda wa majibu (upeo) 1190.11s 61.20s
Muda wa majibu (jumla) 2455.39s 147.38s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#167 Laguna S 2.1

high
Gharama
$0.001
Muda
6.8s
Tokeni
1,389 tok

#157 GLM 5.1

none
SVG batili
Gharama
$0.000
Muda
300.0s
Tokeni
0 tok

Modeli bora kwa alama

Alama dhidi ya gharama ya jumla

Muda wa majibu (wastani)

Alama vs Muda wa majibu (wastani)

Jumla ya tokeni za matokeo

Alama vs Jumla ya tokeni za matokeo

Mgawanyo wa kategoria

Uandishi wa msimbo Alama Uthabiti Kiwango cha kupita kwa kila jaribio Majaribio yasiyo thabiti Majaribio sahihi Muda wa majibu (wastani) Tokeni za ingizo Tokeni za matokeo Tokeni za hoja
Laguna S 2.1 5.3 7.2 44.4% 1 271.42s 6,496 59,355 151,009
GLM 5.1 3.9 9.7 0.0% 0 4.96s 7,256 525 0

Ulinganisho wa haraka

Badilisha jozi ya ulinganisho