AI BENCHY
Comparar Gráficos Metodologia
❤️ Made by XCS
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Categoria AI BENCHY

Ranking de Específico do domínio

Veja quais modelos de IA vão melhor em Específico do domínio, quais permanecem confiáveis e onde aparecem as maiores diferenças. Ordenar por: Tempo de resposta (médio) ↓.

Modelos exibidos

55

Média de Pontuação de Específico do domínio

6.4

Melhor modelo

MiniMax M2.5 10.0
Posição Modelo Empresa Pontuação de Específico do domínio Pontuação média Testes corretos Tempo de resposta (médio)
#43 MiniMax M2.5 medium Minimax 10.0 4.7 0/3 237.3s
#34 GPT-5 Nano medium OpenAI 4.0 5.5 1/3 204.0s
#52 GLM 4.7 Flash medium Z.ai 10.0 3.1 0/3 174.6s
#13 Step 3.5 Flash medium Stepfun 4.0 7.4 1/3 170.5s
#24 Qwen3.5-Flash medium Qwen 4.0 6.9 1/3 146.5s
#28 Kimi K2.5 medium Moonshot AI 10.0 6.4 0/3 137.3s
#8 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview high Google 4.0 8.2 1/3 127.6s
#30 Grok 4.1 Fast medium X AI 4.0 6.2 1/3 121.8s
#21 MiMo-V2-Flash medium Xiaomi 4.0 7.2 1/3 96.0s
#35 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B medium Qwen 10.0 5.5 0/3 88.3s
#26 Claude Opus 4.6 medium Anthropic 10.0 6.6 0/3 83.4s
#7 Qwen3.5-27B medium Qwen 4.0 8.2 1/3 79.5s
#27 GPT-5.2 medium OpenAI 4.0 6.5 1/3 77.8s
#9 GPT-5.4 medium OpenAI 4.0 8.0 1/3 74.3s
#3 GPT-5.3-Codex medium OpenAI 4.0 8.4 1/3 64.3s
#10 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B medium Qwen 10.0 7.7 0/3 63.4s
#39 gpt-oss-120b medium OpenAI 10.0 5.1 0/3 50.9s
#32 GPT-5 Mini medium OpenAI 10.0 6.0 0/3 44.6s
#18 DeepSeek V3.2 medium DeepSeek 4.0 7.3 1/3 39.3s
#16 Gemini 2.5 Flash medium Google 4.0 7.4 1/3 37.3s
#2 Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview medium Google 7.0 9.4 2/3 32.7s
#1 Gemini 3 Flash Preview medium Google 10.0 10.0 3/3 21.1s
#15 GPT-5.2 Chat none OpenAI 4.0 7.4 1/3 17.8s
#4 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 medium Qwen 4.0 8.3 1/3 17.5s
#19 GPT-5.3 Chat none OpenAI 10.0 7.3 0/3 13.0s
#5 Gemini 3 Flash Preview low Google 4.0 8.2 1/3 8.05s
#6 Gemini 3 Pro Preview medium Google 4.0 8.2 1/3 7.01s
#36 Mercury 2 medium Inception 10.0 5.3 0/3 6.48s
#46 Kimi K2.5 none Moonshot AI 4.0 4.1 1/3 4.38s
#12 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview medium Google 10.0 7.5 0/3 4.21s
#25 Claude Sonnet 4.6 none Anthropic 7.0 6.8 2/3 3.54s
#17 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview low Google 4.0 7.3 1/3 2.36s
#31 GLM 5 none Z.ai 10.0 6.0 0/3 2.24s
#33 DeepSeek V3.2 none DeepSeek 10.0 5.5 0/3 1.61s
#29 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 none Qwen 4.0 6.2 1/3 1.17s
#44 GPT-5.4 none OpenAI 4.0 4.5 1/3 1.07s
#53 Grok 4.1 Fast none X AI 4.0 2.9 1/3 1.06s
#20 Gemini 3 Flash Preview none Google 7.0 7.2 2/3 963ms
#48 Qwen3 Coder Next none Qwen 4.0 4.0 1/3 962ms
#22 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview none Google 4.0 7.1 1/3 942ms
#37 Qwen3.5-Flash none Qwen 7.0 5.2 2/3 905ms
#45 Trinity Large Preview none Arcee AI 4.0 4.2 1/3 877ms
#49 GLM 4.7 Flash none Z.ai 7.0 3.9 2/3 744ms
#50 Qwen3 Coder Next medium Qwen 4.0 3.5 1/3 638ms
#47 GPT-4o-mini none OpenAI 10.0 4.0 0/3 637ms
#54 MiMo-V2-Flash none Xiaomi 4.0 2.9 1/3 564ms
#41 Qwen3.5-27B none Qwen 10.0 4.9 0/3 540ms
#51 Mercury 2 none Inception 4.0 3.4 1/3 534ms
#38 Gemini 2.5 Flash none Google 4.0 5.2 1/3 495ms
#42 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B none Qwen 7.0 4.7 2/3 485ms
#40 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B none Qwen 4.0 5.0 1/3 465ms
#55 LFM2-24B-A2B none Liquid 4.0 2.6 1/3 287ms
#11 Claude Sonnet 4.6 medium Anthropic 10.0 7.7 0/3 0ms
#14 GLM 5 medium Z.ai 10.0 7.4 0/3 0ms
#23 Seed-2.0-Mini medium Bytedance Seed 10.0 6.9 0/3 0ms

Melhores modelos por Pontuação de Específico do domínio

Pontuação de Específico do domínio vs custo total

Melhores modelos por Tempo de resposta (médio)