#58 DeepSeek V4 Pro
none
Ongeldige SVG
- Kosten
- $0.000
- Tijd
- 300.0s
- Tokens
- 0 tok
AI BENCHY Compare
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash
Samenvatting
Benchmarkvergelijking DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Gemini 2.5 Flash: Gemini 2.5 Flash leidt in gemiddelde score met 8.2 vs 7.2. DeepSeek V4 Pro heeft lagere benchmarkkosten met $0.034 vs $0.379. DeepSeek V4 Pro is sneller met 6.41s vs 15.49s, met slagingspercentages van 52.4% vs 69.8%.
Aanbevolen model: DeepSeek V4 Pro - Het biedt de beste totale afweging: concurrerende score (7.2), lagere kosten dan Gemini 2.5 Flash en evenwichtige responstijd.
Benchmarks gegenereerd uit AI BENCHY-testsuites op: 2026-06-18
| Metriek | DeepSeek V4 Pro DeepSeek V4 Pro none | Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash medium |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 7.2 | 8.2 |
| Rang | #58 | #24 |
| Betrouwbaarheid | 9.9 | 10.0 |
| Consistentie | 8.8 | 9.6 |
| Correcte tests | ||
| Slaagpercentage per poging | 52.4% | 69.8% |
| Instabiele tests | 3 | 1 |
| Totaal runs | 63 | 63 |
| Kosten per resultaat | 0.333 | 2.701 |
| Totale kosten | $0.034 | $0.379 |
| Invoerprijs | $0.435 / 1M | $0.300 / 1M |
| Uitvoerprijs | $0.870 / 1M | $2.500 / 1M |
| Totaal aantal invoer-tokens | 53,558 | 34,476 |
| Uitvoer-tokens | 11,424 | 1,930 |
| Redeneer-tokens | 0 | 145,145 |
| Responstijd (gem.) | 6.41s | 15.49s |
| Responstijd (max) | 30.09s | 95.48s |
| Responstijd (totaal) | 134.66s | 325.39s |
Generatie-showcase
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#24 Gemini 2.5 Flash
medium
Ongeldige SVG
- Kosten
- $0.000
- Tijd
- 274.0s
- Tokens
- 0 tok
Topmodellen op score
Score vs totale kosten
Responstijd (gem.)
Score vs Responstijd (gem.)
Totaal aantal uitvoer-tokens
Score vs Totaal aantal uitvoer-tokens
Categorie-uitsplitsing
| Anti-AI-trucs | Score | Consistentie | Slaagpercentage per poging | Instabiele tests | Correcte tests | Responstijd (gem.) | Invoer-tokens | Uitvoer-tokens | Redeneer-tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek V4 Pro | 3.2 | 6.1 | 16.7% | 2 | 4.02s | 540 | 1,168 | 0 | |
| Gemini 2.5 Flash | 8.4 | 10.0 | 75.0% | 0 | 6.30s | 492 | 255 | 10,233 |
| Programmeren | Score | Consistentie | Slaagpercentage per poging | Instabiele tests | Correcte tests | Responstijd (gem.) | Invoer-tokens | Uitvoer-tokens | Redeneer-tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek V4 Pro | 5.6 | 10.0 | 33.3% | 0 | 13.38s | 7,275 | 5,500 | 0 | |
| Gemini 2.5 Flash | 7.8 | 10.0 | 66.7% | 0 | 41.01s | 6,669 | 543 | 32,303 |
| Gecombineerd | Score | Consistentie | Slaagpercentage per poging | Instabiele tests | Correcte tests | Responstijd (gem.) | Invoer-tokens | Uitvoer-tokens | Redeneer-tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek V4 Pro | 9.5 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 23.74s | 27,529 | 2,235 | 0 | |
| Gemini 2.5 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 28.44s | 12,522 | 303 | 11,922 |
| Gegevensparsering en extractie | Score | Consistentie | Slaagpercentage per poging | Instabiele tests | Correcte tests | Responstijd (gem.) | Invoer-tokens | Uitvoer-tokens | Redeneer-tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek V4 Pro | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 4.61s | 7,568 | 200 | 0 | |
| Gemini 2.5 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 4.06s | 7,257 | 279 | 2,325 |
| Domeinspecifiek | Score | Consistentie | Slaagpercentage per poging | Instabiele tests | Correcte tests | Responstijd (gem.) | Invoer-tokens | Uitvoer-tokens | Redeneer-tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek V4 Pro | 5.3 | 10.0 | 33.3% | 0 | 3.72s | 666 | 24 | 0 | |
| Gemini 2.5 Flash | 5.9 | 7.2 | 55.6% | 1 | 37.34s | 633 | 18 | 80,702 |
| Algemene intelligentie | Score | Consistentie | Slaagpercentage per poging | Instabiele tests | Correcte tests | Responstijd (gem.) | Invoer-tokens | Uitvoer-tokens | Redeneer-tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek V4 Pro | 5.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 2.05s | 471 | 126 | 0 | |
| Gemini 2.5 Flash | 4.8 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 4.86s | 486 | 92 | 1,899 |
| Instructies opvolgen | Score | Consistentie | Slaagpercentage per poging | Instabiele tests | Correcte tests | Responstijd (gem.) | Invoer-tokens | Uitvoer-tokens | Redeneer-tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek V4 Pro | 6.3 | 5.8 | 66.7% | 1 | 4.12s | 627 | 713 | 0 | |
| Gemini 2.5 Flash | 9.8 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 2.62s | 615 | 69 | 1,203 |
| Puzzeloplossing | Score | Consistentie | Slaagpercentage per poging | Instabiele tests | Correcte tests | Responstijd (gem.) | Invoer-tokens | Uitvoer-tokens | Redeneer-tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek V4 Pro | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 3.61s | 594 | 442 | 0 | |
| Gemini 2.5 Flash | 7.7 | 10.0 | 66.7% | 0 | 3.18s | 558 | 126 | 2,499 |
| Toolaanroepen | Score | Consistentie | Slaagpercentage per poging | Instabiele tests | Correcte tests | Responstijd (gem.) | Invoer-tokens | Uitvoer-tokens | Redeneer-tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek V4 Pro | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 7.40s | 8,105 | 328 | 0 | |
| Gemini 2.5 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 6.20s | 5,088 | 234 | 1,140 |
| Algemene kennis | Score | Consistentie | Slaagpercentage per poging | Instabiele tests | Correcte tests | Responstijd (gem.) | Invoer-tokens | Uitvoer-tokens | Redeneer-tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek V4 Pro | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 5.76s | 183 | 688 | 0 | |
| Gemini 2.5 Flash | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 2.76s | 156 | 11 | 919 |
Snelle vergelijking
Vergelijkingspaar wisselen
DeepSeek V4 PrononevsGemma 4 26B A4BmediumGratis beschikbaarDeepSeek V4 FlashhighvsGemini 2.5 FlashmediumDeepSeek V4 PrononevsStep 3.7 FlashhighDeepSeek V4 PrononevsGLM 5.1mediumDeepSeek V4 PrononevsKimi K2.7 CodemediumDeepSeek V4 PrononevsGrok 4.20mediumDeepSeek V4 PrononevsGemini 3 Flash PreviewlowDeepSeek V4 PrononevsMiMo-V2.5-PromediumSeed-2.0-MinimediumvsDeepSeek V4 PrononeGemini 2.5 FlashmediumvsGPT-5.2 ChatnoneDeepSeek V4 PrononevsQwen3.6 FlashmediumDeepSeek V4 PrononevsGPT-5.4 Nanomedium