Gegevensparsering en extractie-ranglijst
Zie welke AI-modellen het best presteren op Gegevensparsering en extractie, welke betrouwbaar blijven en waar de grootste verschillen zitten. Sorteren op: Metriek ↑.
Getoonde modellen
15
Gemiddelde Gegevensparsering en extractie-score
0.9
Beste model
Gemini 3 Flash Preview 0.0
451/451
Modellen filteren
Geen modellen komen overeen met de huidige zoekopdracht en filters.
| Rang | Model | Bedrijf | Gegevensparsering en extractie-score | Score | Totale kosten | Correcte tests | Responstijd (gem.) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #200 | Claude Opus 4.8 none | Anthropic | 0.7 | 0.7 | $2.334 | 1/2 | 1.77s |
| #248 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro medium | Xiaomi | 0.7 | 0.6 | $0.332 | 1/2 | 18.8s |
| #249 | Dots 3 Note Preview high | Dots Studio | 0.7 | 0.6 | $0.000 | 1/2 | 12.7s |
| #250 | Dots 3 Note Preview low | Dots Studio | 0.7 | 0.6 | $0.000 | 1/2 | 11.5s |
| #253 | Qwen3.6 27B none | Qwen | 0.7 | 0.6 | $0.148 | 1/2 | 2.06s |
| #264 | Trinity Large Thinking low | Arcee AI | 0.7 | 0.6 | $0.918 | 1/2 | 14.3s |
| #333 | Kimi K2.5 none | Moonshot AI | 0.7 | 0.5 | $0.262 | 1/2 | 42.1s |
| #341 | Mimo V2 PRO medium | Xiaomi | 0.7 | 0.5 | $0.333 | 1/2 | 17.2s |
| #366 | GLM 4.7 Flash none | Z.ai | 0.7 | 0.5 | $0.027 | 1/2 | 4.82s |
| #136 | Muse Glimmer 30B high | Meta | 0.7 | 0.8 | $0.506 | 1/2 | 14.9s |
| #141 | Muse Glimmer 30B medium | Meta | 0.7 | 0.8 | $0.288 | 1/2 | 7.20s |
| #188 | Ember-1 low | Fireworks | 0.7 | 0.7 | $1.488 | 1/2 | 34.8s |
| #196 | Ember-1 high | Fireworks | 0.7 | 0.7 | $2.405 | 1/2 | 36.1s |
| #202 | Qwen3.5-Flash medium | Qwen | 0.7 | 0.7 | $0.184 | 1/2 | 57.0s |
| #223 | Mercury 2 medium | Inception | 0.7 | 0.7 | $0.121 | 1/2 | 1.11s |