Gegevensparsering en extractie-ranglijst
Zie welke AI-modellen het best presteren op Gegevensparsering en extractie, welke betrouwbaar blijven en waar de grootste verschillen zitten. Sorteren op: Responstijd (gem.) ↑.
Getoonde modellen
15
Gemiddelde Gegevensparsering en extractie-score
8.9
Beste model
MiMo-V2-Flash 6.5
216/216
Modellen filteren
Geen modellen komen overeen met de huidige zoekopdracht en filters.
| Rang | Model | Bedrijf | Gegevensparsering en extractie-score | Score | Totale kosten | Correcte tests | Responstijd (gem.) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #96 | LongCat 2.0 low | Meituan | 6.3 | 6.7 | $0.391 | 1/2 | 10.8s |
| #139 | Gemini 3 PRO Preview medium | 10.0 | 6.0 | $0.385 | 2/2 | 10.8s | |
| #102 | LongCat 2.0 high | Meituan | 3.6 | 6.6 | $0.469 | 0/2 | 11.0s |
| #141 | Hy3 preview high | Tencent | 6.5 | 5.9 | $0.048 | 1/2 | 12.1s |
| #56 | Kimi K2.7 Code medium | Moonshot AI | 10.0 | 7.5 | $0.740 | 2/2 | 12.3s |
| #17 | Claude Opus 4.8 medium | Anthropic | 7.1 | 8.8 | $1.931 | 1/2 | 12.3s |
| #29 | GPT-5 Mini medium | OpenAI | 10.0 | 8.1 | $0.237 | 2/2 | 12.6s |
| #94 | Qwen3.6 35B A3B medium | Qwen | 10.0 | 6.7 | $0.746 | 2/2 | 13.0s |
| #42 | GLM 5.2 medium | Z.ai | 10.0 | 7.8 | $0.187 | 2/2 | 13.4s |
| #44 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 medium | Anthropic | 10.0 | 7.8 | $2.057 | 2/2 | 13.9s |
| #90 | Step 3.7 Flash high | Stepfun | 10.0 | 6.9 | $1.207 | 2/2 | 14.7s |
| #51 | MiniMax M3 medium | Minimax | 10.0 | 7.6 | $0.286 | 2/2 | 14.9s |
| #41 | Qwen3.6 Plus medium | Qwen | 10.0 | 7.8 | $0.405 | 2/2 | 14.9s |
| #181 | Qwen3.6 Plus Preview medium | Qwen | 10.0 | 4.9 | $0.000 | 2/2 | 14.9s |
| #136 | Step 3.5 Flash medium | Stepfun | 10.0 | 6.0 | $0.108 | 2/2 | 15.0s |