#120 GLM 4.7 Flash
none
Invalid SVG
- Cost
- $0.000
- Time
- 300.0s
- Tokens
- 0 tok
Z.ai
Release: 2026-01-19
Tested on: 2026-06-04 13:05
z-ai/glm-4.7-flash::none
30B total (3B active)MoEOpen source
(medium)
(none)
Summary
GLM 4.7 Flash scores 5.5 on AI BENCHY and ranks #120. It has 10.0 reliability, a 36.5% pass rate, $0.004 total cost, and 2.86s average response time.
What makes GLM 4.7 Flash unique: It stands out most in Domain specific, where it ranks #1, while Anti-AI Tricks is its weakest area at #18. Its total benchmark cost is unusually low for its score range.
Model facts
Researched on 2026-08-12
- Parameters
- 30B total (3B active)
- Architecture
- MoE
- Availability
- Open source
- License
- MIT
5.5
Consistency
8.8
10.0
$0.004
Total Output Tokens
2,521
Total Input Tokens
38,745
Input Price
$0.060 / 1M
Output Price
$0.400 / 1M
Flaky tests
3
Flaky tests had mixed outcomes across runs (at least one pass and one fail).
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
Run history
| Tested on | Score | Reliability | Tests Correct | Total Cost | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-14 01:33 Re-test | 4.8 | 10.0 | $0.016 | Compare | |
| 2026-07-16 21:18 New test added | 4.9 | 10.0 | $0.016 | Compare | |
| 2026-06-04 13:05 New test added | 5.5 | 10.0 | $0.004 | Current run | |
| 2026-05-21 23:41 Suite changed | 5.6 | 10.0 | $0.004 | Compare | |
| 2026-04-11 01:19 First recorded run | 5.6 | N/A | $0.003 | Compare |
This run used a different benchmark suite. Keep suite changes in mind when reading historical movement.
Run comparison
| Run | Benchmark coverage | Score | Consistency | Reliability | Tests Correct | Flaky tests | Total Output Tokens | Total Input Tokens | Total Cost | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-04 13:05 · New test added | 63/63 attempts | 5.5 | 8.8 | 10.0 | 6/21 | 3 | 2,521 | 38,745 | $0.004 | 2.86s |
| 2026-08-14 01:33 · Re-test | 66/66 attempts | 4.8 | 8.9 | 10.0 | 5/22 | 3 | 22,992 | 101,513 | $0.016 | 8.81s |
| Difference | — | +0.8 | -0.1 | 0.0 | +1 | 0 | -20471 | -62768 | -$0.012 | -5945ms |
Benchmark coverage differs: 63/63 attempts (Target: 3 repeats per test) versus 66/66 attempts (Target: 3 repeats per test). Totals and repeat-sensitive metrics are not directly comparable.
These two runs used different benchmark suites, so the deltas reflect both model changes and suite changes.
Price History
Historical pricing data for this model from OpenRouter.
| Date | Input Price | Output Price |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-04 14:42 | $0.060 / 1M | $0.400 / 1M |
Charts
Choose the first model, then click a second model to open a side-by-side page.
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Quick Compare
GLM 4.7 FlashnonevsKAT-Coder-Air V2.5noneGLM 4.7 FlashnonevsTrinity Large PreviewnoneGLM 4.7 FlashnonevsTrinity Large ThinkinghighGLM 4.7 FlashnonevsCobuddymediumGLM 4.7 FlashnonevsGPT-5.4 NanononeGLM 4.7 FlashnonevsMercury 2noneGLM 4.7 FlashnonevsNemotron 3.5 LightninglowFree AvailableGLM 4.7 FlashnonevsQwen3 Coder NextmediumGLM 4.7 FlashnonevsRing-2.6-1TnoneGLM 4.7 FlashnonevsMiniMax M2.5medium
Category Breakdown
| Category | Score | Consistency | Tests Correct |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anti-AI Tricks | 5.2 | 7.9 | |
| Coding | 4.3 | 10.0 | |
| Combined | 3.0 | 10.0 | |
| Data parsing and extraction | 7.3 | 5.8 | |
| Domain specific | 7.7 | 10.0 | |
| General Intelligence | 4.0 | 10.0 | |
| Instructions following | 6.5 | 10.0 | |
| Puzzle Solving | 6.4 | 10.0 | |
| Tool Calling | 2.8 | 1.6 | |
| Trivia | 3.0 | 10.0 |