#141 Qwen3 Coder Next
medium
Invalid SVG
- Cost
- $0.000
- Time
- 300.0s
- Tokens
- 0 tok
Qwen
Release: 2026-02-03
Tested on: 2026-05-21 23:45
qwen/qwen3-coder-next::medium
80B total (3B active)MoEOpen source
(medium)
(none)
Summary
Qwen3 Coder Next scores 4.7 on AI BENCHY and ranks #141. It has 10.0 reliability, a 30.0% pass rate, $0.008 total cost, and 9.29s average response time.
What makes Qwen3 Coder Next unique: Its total benchmark cost is unusually low for its score range.
Model facts
Researched on 2026-08-12
- Parameters
- 80B total (3B active)
- Architecture
- MoE
- Availability
- Open source
- License
- Apache-2.0
4.7
Consistency
8.9
10.0
$0.008
Total Output Tokens
3,280
Total Input Tokens
0
Input Price
$0.110 / 1M
Output Price
$0.800 / 1M
Flaky tests
3
Flaky tests had mixed outcomes across runs (at least one pass and one fail).
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
Run history
| Tested on | Score | Reliability | Tests Correct | Total Cost | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-14 01:38 Re-test | 4.6 | 10.0 | $0.034 ↑ | Compare | |
| 2026-07-16 21:16 New test added | 4.7 | 10.0 | $0.032 ↓ | Compare | |
| 2026-06-04 13:09 New test added | 4.6 | 10.0 | $0.008 ↓ | Compare | |
| 2026-05-21 23:45 Suite changed | 4.7 | 10.0 | $0.008 | Current run | |
| 2026-04-14 00:56 First recorded run | 4.7 | N/A | $0.008 | Compare |
This run used a different benchmark suite. Keep suite changes in mind when reading historical movement.
Run comparison
| Run | Benchmark coverage | Score | Consistency | Reliability | Tests Correct | Flaky tests | Total Output Tokens | Total Input Tokens | Total Cost | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-21 23:45 · Suite changed | 60/60 attempts | 4.7 | 8.9 | 10.0 | 4/20 | 3 | 3,280 | 0 | $0.008 | 9.29s |
| 2026-08-14 01:38 · Re-test | 66/66 attempts | 4.6 | 8.6 | 10.0 | 3/22 | 4 | 19,069 | 148,203 | $0.034 | 9.07s |
| Difference | — | +0.1 | +0.3 | 0.0 | +1 | -1 | -15789 | -148203 | -$0.026 | +220ms |
Benchmark coverage differs: 60/60 attempts (Target: 3 repeats per test) versus 66/66 attempts (Target: 3 repeats per test). Totals and repeat-sensitive metrics are not directly comparable.
These two runs used different benchmark suites, so the deltas reflect both model changes and suite changes.
Charts
Choose the first model, then click a second model to open a side-by-side page.
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Quick Compare
Qwen3 Coder NextmediumvsMercury 2noneQwen3 Coder NextmediumvsMiniMax M2.5mediumQwen3 Coder NextmediumvsCobuddymediumQwen3 Coder NextmediumvsLaguna S 2.1noneFree AvailableQwen3 Coder NextmediumvsTrinity Large PreviewnoneQwen3 Coder NextmediumvsGLM 4.7 FlashmediumQwen3 Coder NextmediumvsGLM 4.7 FlashnoneQwen3 Coder NextmediumvsGrok 4.20noneQwen3 Coder NextmediumvsKAT-Coder-Air V2.5noneQwen3 Coder NextmediumvsLing 3.0 Tinynone
Category Breakdown
| Category | Score | Consistency | Tests Correct |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anti-AI Tricks | 3.5 | 8.1 | |
| Coding | 4.1 | 5.8 | |
| Combined | 3.0 | 10.0 | |
| Data parsing and extraction | 6.5 | 10.0 | |
| Domain specific | 5.3 | 10.0 | |
| General Intelligence | 6.3 | 3.4 | |
| Instructions following | 6.3 | 10.0 | |
| Puzzle Solving | 3.0 | 10.0 | |
| Tool Calling | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Trivia | 3.0 | 10.0 |