Advertise here
#179

Qwen3.6 27B

Qwen Release: 2026-04-20 Tested on: 2026-08-14 01:41 qwen/qwen3.6-27b::medium
27BDenseOpen source
(medium) (none)

Summary

Qwen3.6 27B scores 6.5 on AI BENCHY and ranks #179. It has 10.0 reliability, a 60.6% pass rate, $0.577 total cost, and 106.06s average response time.

What makes Qwen3.6 27B unique: It stands out most in Coding, where it ranks #2, while Data parsing and extraction is its weakest area at #15.

Model facts

Researched on 2026-08-12

Reported
Parameters
27B
Architecture
Dense
Availability
Open source
License
Apache-2.0

Score

6.5

Consistency

7.6

Total Cost (Current Price)

$0.577 ↓ -22.5%

Tested at: $0.745

Total Output Tokens

272,573

Total Input Tokens

106,176

Input Price

$0.300 / 1M

Output Price

$2.000 / 1M

Tests Correct

Wrong Tests: 12

Attempt pass rate: 60.6%

Flaky tests

7

Flaky tests had mixed outcomes across runs (at least one pass and one fail).

Response Time (avg)

106.06s

Response Time (max): 1085.11s

Response Time (total): 2333.36s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#179 Qwen3.6 27B

medium
Cost
$0.009
Time
39.6s
Tokens
3,090 tok

Run history

Tested on Score Reliability Tests Correct Total Cost Compare
2026-08-14 01:41 Re-test 6.5 10.0 $0.577 Current run
2026-07-16 22:13 New test added 6.5 10.0 $0.779 Compare
2026-06-04 13:21 New test added 6.8 10.0 $0.444 Compare
2026-05-21 23:59 Suite changed 6.6 9.9 $0.272 Compare
2026-04-27 21:48 New test added 7.0 10.0 $0.209 Compare
2026-04-27 21:31 First recorded run 7.9 10.0 $0.043 Compare

This run used a different benchmark suite. Keep suite changes in mind when reading historical movement.

Run comparison

RunBenchmark coverageScoreConsistencyReliabilityTests CorrectFlaky testsTotal Output TokensTotal Input TokensTotal CostResponse Time (avg)
2026-08-14 01:41 · Current run66/66 attempts6.57.610.010/227272,573106,176$0.577106.06s
2026-06-04 13:21 · New test added63/63 attempts6.88.210.010/215138,71039,376$0.44459.71s
Difference-0.2-0.60.00+2+133863+66800+$0.134+46347ms

Benchmark coverage differs: 66/66 attempts (Target: 3 repeats per test) versus 63/63 attempts (Target: 3 repeats per test). Totals and repeat-sensitive metrics are not directly comparable.

These two runs used different benchmark suites, so the deltas reflect both model changes and suite changes.

Price History

Historical pricing data for this model from OpenRouter.

Date Input Price Output Price
2026-06-04 15:40 $0.290 / 1M $3.200 / 1M
2026-06-10 13:42 $0.290 / 1M $2.400 / 1M
2026-06-12 18:42 $0.288 / 1M $3.100 / 1M
2026-06-17 10:07 $0.289 / 1M $3.170 / 1M
2026-06-29 01:00 $0.260 / 1M $2.386 / 1M
2026-06-30 21:25 $0.286 / 1M $2.400 / 1M
2026-07-16 15:36 $0.450 / 1M $2.700 / 1M
2026-08-14 12:51 $0.600 / 1M $3.600 / 1M
2026-09-04 19:19 $0.300 / 1M $2.000 / 1M

Charts

Choose the first model, then click a second model to open a side-by-side page.

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Quick Compare

Category Breakdown

Category Score Consistency Tests Correct
Anti-AI Tricks 8.3 10.0
Coding 7.7 10.0
Combined 6.7 3.7
Data parsing and extraction 3.5 1.4
Domain specific 2.9 4.4
General Intelligence 6.5 3.4
Instructions following 10.0 10.0
Puzzle Solving 7.7 10.0
Tool Calling 10.0 10.0
Trivia 3.0 10.0

Compared models