#8 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15
medium- Cost
- $0.011
- Time
- 125.5s
- Tokens
- 7,040 tok
Qwen
Release: 2026-02-15
Tested on: 2026-04-11 01:44
qwen/qwen3.5-plus-02-15::medium
~397B total (~17B active)MoEClosedEstimated
(medium)
(none)
Summary
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 scores 8.5 on AI BENCHY and ranks #8. It has N/A reliability, a 83.3% pass rate, $0.220 total cost, and 46.56s average response time.
Model facts
Researched on 2026-08-12
- Parameters
- ~397B total (~17B active)
- Architecture
- MoE
- Availability
- Closed
- License
- -
Best estimate from public evidence; the vendor did not disclose every value. Estimate from the released 397B/A17B family architecture.
8.5
Consistency
9.1
N/A
$0.220
Total Output Tokens
114,010
Total Input Tokens
0
Input Price
$0.260 / 1M
Output Price
$1.560 / 1M
Flaky tests
2
Flaky tests had mixed outcomes across runs (at least one pass and one fail).
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
Run history
| Tested on | Score | Reliability | Tests Correct | Total Cost | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-14 01:42 Re-test | 7.5 | 10.0 | $0.459 ↓ | Compare | |
| 2026-07-16 21:32 New test added | 7.5 | 10.0 | $0.437 ↓ | Compare | |
| 2026-06-04 13:17 New test added | 7.9 | 8.9 | $0.310 ↓ | Compare | |
| 2026-05-21 23:53 Suite changed | 8.1 | 10.0 | $0.317 | Compare | |
| 2026-04-11 01:44 First recorded run | 8.5 | N/A | $0.220 | Current run |
Run comparison
| Run | Benchmark coverage | Score | Consistency | Reliability | Tests Correct | Flaky tests | Total Output Tokens | Total Input Tokens | Total Cost | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-11 01:44 · First recorded run | 54/54 attempts | 8.5 | 9.1 | N/A | 14/18 | 2 | 114,010 | 0 | $0.220 | 46.56s |
| 2026-07-16 21:32 · New test added | 66/66 attempts | 7.5 | 8.5 | 10.0 | 14/22 | 4 | 260,704 | 113,560 | $0.437 | 89.19s |
| Difference | — | +1.0 | +0.6 | 0 | -2 | -146694 | -113560 | -$0.218 | -42631ms |
Benchmark coverage differs: 54/54 attempts (Target: 3 repeats per test) versus 66/66 attempts (Target: 3 repeats per test). Totals and repeat-sensitive metrics are not directly comparable.
These two runs used different benchmark suites, so the deltas reflect both model changes and suite changes.
Charts
Choose the first model, then click a second model to open a side-by-side page.
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Quick Compare
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15mediumvsGPT 5.3 ChatnoneQwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15mediumvsQwen3.5-27BmediumQwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15mediumvsMiniMax M3mediumQwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15mediumvsGPT-5.4 MinimediumQwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15mediumvsGPT-5.6 TerralowQwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15mediumvsGrok Build 0.1mediumQwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15mediumvsGPT-5.4 NanomediumQwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15mediumvsGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewmediumQwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15mediumvsClaude Opus 5noneQwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15mediumvsQwen3.7 Maxnone
Category Breakdown
| Category | Score | Consistency | Tests Correct |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anti-AI Tricks | 8.2 | 7.9 | |
| Coding | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Combined | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Data parsing and extraction | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Domain specific | 5.3 | 10.0 | |
| General Intelligence | 4.7 | 1.6 | |
| Instructions following | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Puzzle Solving | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Tool Calling | 10.0 | 10.0 |