Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Meituan: LongCat 2.0 vs Qwen: Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15

Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 (medium) leads on average score with 7.5 vs 7.4. Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.437 vs $0.478. Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 (medium) is faster at 89.19s vs 136.64s, with pass rates of 60.6% vs 71.2%.

Recommended modelQwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 (medium)It has the best score here (7.5), while responding about 1.5x faster than LongCat 2.0 (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-20

Metric LongCat 2.0 LongCat 2.0 medium Release: 2026-07-20 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 medium Release: 2026-02-15
Score 7.4 7.5
Rank #60 #57
Reliability 9.8 10.0
Consistency 8.9 8.5
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 60.6% 71.2%
Flaky tests 3 4
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 3.978 3.348
Total Cost $0.478 $0.437
Input Price $0.300 / 1M $0.260 / 1M
Output Price $1.200 / 1M $1.560 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 97,315 113,560
Output Tokens 44,384 9,823
Reasoning Tokens 329,012 250,881
Response Time (avg) 136.64s 89.19s
Response Time (max) 939.52s 304.85s
Response Time (total) 3006.01s 1337.92s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#60 LongCat 2.0

medium
Cost
$0.016
Time
285.1s
Tokens
13,057 tok

#57 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15

medium
Cost
$0.011
Time
125.5s
Tokens
7,040 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
LongCat 2.0 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 455.00s 7,419 533 214,143
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 6.6 7.1 44.4% 1 180.70s 6,950 420 80,595

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair