AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com
#225

Qwen3.5-35B-A3B

Qwen Release: 2026-02-24 Tested on: 2026-10-01 01:09 qwen/qwen3.5-35b-a3b::medium
35B total (3B active)MoEOpen source
(medium) (none)

Summary

Qwen3.5-35B-A3B scores 6.3 on AI BENCHY and ranks #225. It has 10.0 reliability, a 65.2% pass rate, $0.716 total cost, and 111.54s average response time.

What makes Qwen3.5-35B-A3B unique: It stands out most in Agentic, where it ranks #2, while General Intelligence is its weakest area at #15. It uses unusually many reasoning tokens, which can help explain its slower or more expensive runs.

Model facts

Researched on 2026-08-12

Reported
Parameters
35B total (3B active)
Architecture
MoE
Availability
Open source
License
Apache-2.0

Score

6.3

Consistency

7.5

Total Cost (Current Price)

$0.716 ↓ -38.1%

Tested at: $1.156

Total Output Tokens

913,343

Total Input Tokens

378,048

Input Price

$0.080 / 1M

Output Price

$0.750 / 1M

Cache Read Price

$0.040 / 1M

Cache Write Price

N/A

Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.

Tests Correct

Wrong Tests: 12

Attempt pass rate: 65.2%

Flaky tests

7

Flaky tests had mixed outcomes across runs (at least one pass and one fail).

Response Time (avg)

111.54s

Response Time (max): 950.25s

Response Time (total): 2565.38s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#225 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B

medium
Cost
$0.009
Time
71.4s
Tokens
8,631 tok

Run history

Tested on Score Reliability Tests Correct Total Cost Compare
2026-10-01 01:09 Re-test 6.3 10.0 $0.716 ↓ Current run
2026-07-16 22:51 New test added 6.2 10.0 $0.837 ↓ Compare
2026-06-04 13:42 New test added 7.1 8.9 $0.401 ↓ Compare
2026-05-22 00:15 Suite changed 7.0 6.7 $0.547 Compare
2026-04-11 01:44 First recorded run 7.4 N/A $0.398 Compare

This run used a different benchmark suite. Keep suite changes in mind when reading historical movement.

Run comparison

RunBenchmark coverageScoreConsistencyReliabilityTests CorrectFlaky testsTotal Output TokensTotal Input TokensTotal CostResponse Time (avg)
2026-10-01 01:09 · Current run69/69 attempts6.37.510.011/237913,343378,048$0.716111.54s
2026-07-16 22:51 · New test added66/66 attempts6.27.610.011/226826,670130,388$0.837112.47s
Difference—+0.2-0.10.00+1+86673+247660-$0.122-929ms

Benchmark coverage differs: 69/69 attempts (Target: 3 repeats per test) versus 66/66 attempts (Target: 3 repeats per test). Totals and repeat-sensitive metrics are not directly comparable.

These two runs used different benchmark suites, so the deltas reflect both model changes and suite changes.

Price History

Historical pricing data for this model from OpenRouter.

Date Input Price Output Price Cache Read Price Cache Write Price
2026-06-04 15:40 $0.140 / 1M $1.000 / 1M N/A N/A
2026-08-13 00:05 $0.250 / 1M $1.250 / 1M N/A N/A
2026-08-14 12:51 $0.225 / 1M $1.800 / 1M N/A N/A
2026-10-06 14:54 $0.080 / 1M $0.750 / 1M $0.040 / 1M N/A

Charts

Choose the first model, then click a second model to open a side-by-side page.

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Quick Compare

Category Breakdown

Category Score Consistency Tests Correct
Agentic 7.4 3.8
Anti-AI Tricks 10.0 10.0
Coding 5.9 9.3
Combined 3.8 5.8
Data parsing and extraction 7.3 5.9
Domain specific 3.5 4.4
General Intelligence 2.8 1.6
Instructions following 10.0 10.0
Puzzle Solving 8.2 7.2
Tool Calling 10.0 10.0
Trivia 3.0 10.0

Compared models