AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com
#164

Laguna S 2.1

Poolside Release: 2026-07-21 Tested on: 2026-07-22 12:18 poolside/laguna-s-2.1::medium
118B total (8B active)MoEWeights available
(high) (medium) (low) (none)

Summary

Laguna S 2.1 scores 5.4 on AI BENCHY and ranks #164. It has 9.8 reliability, a 25.8% pass rate, $0.059 total cost, and 58.43s average response time.

What makes Laguna S 2.1 unique: Its total benchmark cost is unusually low for its score range.

Model facts

Researched on 2026-08-12

Reported
Parameters
118B total (8B active)
Architecture
MoE
Availability
Weights available
License
OpenMDW

Score

5.4

Consistency

8.4

Total Output Tokens

339,595

Total Input Tokens

86,641

Input Price

$0.100 / 1M

Output Price

$0.200 / 1M

Tests Correct

Wrong Tests: 18

Attempt pass rate: 25.8%

Flaky tests

4

Flaky tests had mixed outcomes across runs (at least one pass and one fail).

Response Time (avg)

58.43s

Response Time (max): 560.31s

Response Time (total): 1285.48s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#164 Laguna S 2.1

medium
Cost
$0.001
Time
4.0s
Tokens
867 tok

Run history

Tested on Score Reliability Tests Correct Total Cost Compare
2026-08-14 04:00 Re-test 5.4 10.0 $0.053 Compare
2026-07-22 12:18 Initial run 5.4 9.8 $0.059 Current run

Price History

Historical pricing data for this model from OpenRouter.

Date Input Price Output Price
2026-07-22 12:53 $0.100 / 1M $0.200 / 1M

Charts

Choose the first model, then click a second model to open a side-by-side page.

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Quick Compare

Category Breakdown

Category Score Consistency Tests Correct
Anti-AI Tricks 3.4 5.8
Coding 5.3 7.2
Combined 3.2 9.1
Data parsing and extraction 10.0 10.0
Domain specific 2.9 7.2
General Intelligence 4.6 9.8
Instructions following 4.2 9.9
Puzzle Solving 3.1 10.0
Tool Calling 10.0 10.0
Trivia 3.0 10.0

Compared models