AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com
#253

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview

Google Release: 2026-03-03 Tested on: 2026-10-01 02:17 google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview::none
~150B total (~10B active)MoEClosedEstimated

Summary

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview scores 6.2 on AI BENCHY and ranks #253. It has 10.0 reliability, a 55.1% pass rate, $0.090 total cost, and 3.60s average response time.

What makes Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview unique: It stands out most in Instructions following, where it ranks #1, while General Intelligence is its weakest area at #12. It is notably fast compared with similar models.

Identity note

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview was the preview version of Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite.

Model facts

Researched on 2026-08-12

Estimated
Parameters
~150B total (~10B active)
Architecture
MoE
Availability
Closed
License
-

Best estimate from public evidence; the vendor did not disclose every value. Google does not disclose parameter counts.

Score

6.2

Consistency

9.7

Total Output Tokens

15,760

Total Input Tokens

261,962

Input Price

$0.250 / 1M

Output Price

$1.500 / 1M

Cache Read Price

$0.025 / 1M

Cache Write Price

$0.084 / 1M

Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.

Tests Correct

Wrong Tests: 11

Attempt pass rate: 55.1%

Flaky tests

1

Flaky tests had mixed outcomes across runs (at least one pass and one fail).

Response Time (avg)

3.60s

Response Time (max): 48.59s

Response Time (total): 82.91s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#253 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview

none
Cost
$0.003
Time
4.7s
Tokens
1,827 tok

Run history

Tested on Score Reliability Tests Correct Total Cost Compare
2026-10-01 02:17 Re-test 6.2 10.0 $0.090 Current run
2026-07-16 22:52 New test added 6.4 10.0 $0.052 Compare
2026-06-04 14:00 New test added 7.2 10.0 $0.018 Compare
2026-05-22 00:27 Suite changed 7.5 10.0 $0.017 Compare
2026-04-11 01:44 First recorded run 7.9 N/A $0.016 Compare

This run used a different benchmark suite. Keep suite changes in mind when reading historical movement.

Run comparison

RunBenchmark coverageScoreConsistencyReliabilityTests CorrectFlaky testsTotal Output TokensTotal Input TokensTotal CostResponse Time (avg)
2026-10-01 02:17 · Current run69/69 attempts6.29.710.012/23115,760261,962$0.0903.60s
2026-07-16 22:52 · New test added66/66 attempts6.49.710.012/22114,292120,942$0.0521.58s
Difference—-0.30.00.000+1468+141020+$0.038+2027ms

Benchmark coverage differs: 69/69 attempts (Target: 3 repeats per test) versus 66/66 attempts (Target: 3 repeats per test). Totals and repeat-sensitive metrics are not directly comparable.

These two runs used different benchmark suites, so the deltas reflect both model changes and suite changes.

Price History

Historical pricing data for this model from OpenRouter.

Date Input Price Output Price Cache Read Price Cache Write Price
2026-08-14 12:51 $0.250 / 1M $1.500 / 1M N/A N/A
2026-10-01 18:33 $0.250 / 1M $1.500 / 1M $0.025 / 1M $0.084 / 1M

Charts

Choose the first model, then click a second model to open a side-by-side page.

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Quick Compare

Category Breakdown

Category Score Consistency Tests Correct
Agentic 5.0 10.0
Anti-AI Tricks 7.5 8.4
Coding 5.5 10.0
Combined 3.0 10.0
Data parsing and extraction 10.0 10.0
Domain specific 5.3 10.0
General Intelligence 4.0 10.0
Instructions following 10.0 10.0
Puzzle Solving 10.0 10.0
Tool Calling 10.0 10.0
Trivia 3.0 10.0

Compared models