- Score
- 8.6 (+2.48 points)
- Total Cost (Current Price)
- $0.061 · 91.0% cheaper
- Response Time (avg)
- 7.51s · 16.8% faster
Summary
Beam 1.0 501B A23B scores 6.1 on AI BENCHY and ranks #266. It has 10.0 reliability, a 59.4% pass rate, $0.674 total cost, and 9.03s average response time.
What makes Beam 1.0 501B A23B unique: It stands out most in Coding, where it ranks #2, while Tool Calling is its weakest area at #13.
Recommended alternatives
We recommend choosing one of these models instead:
- Score
- 9.4 (+3.27 points)
- Total Cost (Current Price)
- $0.183 · 73.0% cheaper
- Response Time (avg)
- 6.24s · 30.9% faster
- Score
- 9.6 (+3.46 points)
- Total Cost (Current Price)
- $0.460 · 31.9% cheaper
- Response Time (avg)
- 7.15s · 20.8% faster
Model facts
Researched on 2026-10-17
- Parameters
- 501B total (23B active)
- Architecture
- MoE
- Availability
- Open source
- License
- Apache-2.0
The official model card reports 501B total and 23B active parameters, Apache-2.0 weights and public inference integrations. Text-only reasoning model for coding, tool use and mathematical/scientific work. OpenRouter declares mandatory reasoning with low, medium, high, xhigh and max efforts. All four current provider endpoints publish training=false. Provider rates differ; the catalog currently quotes CoreWeave at $1/$3 per million, while eligible Nebius starts at $0.25/$1. Fallback release date records this onboarding request date.
6.1
Consistency
8.3
10.0
$0.674
Total Output Tokens
147,207
Total Input Tokens
232,218
Input Price
$1.000 / 1M
Output Price
$3.000 / 1M
Cache Read Price
$0.100 / 1M
Cache Write Price
N/A
Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.
Flaky tests
5
Flaky tests had mixed outcomes across runs (at least one pass and one fail).
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#266 Beam 1.0 501B A23B
high- Cost
- $0.008
- Time
- 15.6s
- Tokens
- 6,162 tok
Charts
Choose the first model, then click a second model to open a side-by-side page.
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Quick Compare
Category Breakdown
| Category | Score | Consistency | Tests Correct |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agentic | 3.0 | 10.0 | |
| Anti-AI Tricks | 8.8 | 8.3 | |
| Coding | 8.4 | 7.4 | |
| Combined | 3.0 | 10.0 | |
| Data parsing and extraction | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Domain specific | 3.6 | 7.2 | |
| General Intelligence | 5.1 | 3.4 | |
| Instructions following | 9.8 | 10.0 | |
| Puzzle Solving | 8.2 | 7.2 | |
| Tool Calling | 3.0 | 10.0 | |
| Trivia | 3.0 | 10.0 |