#157 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
none- Cost
- $0.003
- Time
- 4.7s
- Tokens
- 1,827 tok
Summary
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview scores 6.4 on AI BENCHY and ranks #157. It has 10.0 reliability, a 57.6% pass rate, $0.052 total cost, and 1.56s average response time.
What makes Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview unique: It is notably fast compared with similar models.
Identity note
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview was the preview version of Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite.
Researched on 2026-08-12
Best estimate from public evidence; the vendor did not disclose every value. Google does not disclose parameter counts.
6.4
Consistency
9.7
10.0
$0.052
Total Output Tokens
14,161
Total Input Tokens
120,955
Input Price
$0.250 / 1M
Output Price
$1.500 / 1M
Flaky tests
1
Flaky tests had mixed outcomes across runs (at least one pass and one fail).
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
Run history
| Tested on | Score | Reliability | Tests Correct | Total Cost | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-14 02:43 Re-test | 6.4 | 10.0 | $0.052 | Current run | |
| 2026-07-16 22:52 New test added | 6.4 | 10.0 | $0.052 | Compare | |
| 2026-06-04 14:00 New test added | 7.2 | 10.0 | $0.018 | Compare | |
| 2026-05-22 00:27 Suite changed | 7.5 | 10.0 | $0.017 | Compare | |
| 2026-04-11 01:44 First recorded run | 7.9 | N/A | $0.016 | Compare |
This run used a different benchmark suite. Keep suite changes in mind when reading historical movement.
Run comparison
| Run | Benchmark coverage | Score | Consistency | Reliability | Tests Correct | Flaky tests | Total Output Tokens | Total Input Tokens | Total Cost | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-14 02:43 · Current run | 66/66 attempts | 6.4 | 9.7 | 10.0 | 12/22 | 1 | 14,161 | 120,955 | $0.052 | 1.56s |
| 2026-06-04 14:00 · New test added | 63/63 attempts | 7.2 | 9.7 | 10.0 | 12/21 | 1 | 5,547 | 37,582 | $0.018 | 1.21s |
| Difference | — | -0.8 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | +8614 | +83373 | +$0.034 | +348ms |
Benchmark coverage differs: 66/66 attempts (Target: 3 repeats per test) versus 63/63 attempts (Target: 3 repeats per test). Totals and repeat-sensitive metrics are not directly comparable.
These two runs used different benchmark suites, so the deltas reflect both model changes and suite changes.
Price History
Historical pricing data for this model from OpenRouter.
| Date | Input Price | Output Price |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-14 12:51 | $0.250 / 1M | $1.500 / 1M |
Choose the first model, then click a second model to open a side-by-side page.
| Category | Score | Consistency | Tests Correct |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anti-AI Tricks | 7.5 | 8.4 | |
| Coding | 5.5 | 10.0 | |
| Combined | 3.0 | 10.0 | |
| Data parsing and extraction | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Domain specific | 5.3 | 10.0 | |
| General Intelligence | 4.0 | 10.0 | |
| Instructions following | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Puzzle Solving | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Tool Calling | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Trivia | 3.0 | 10.0 |