#147 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
none- Cost
- $0.001
- Time
- 4.5s
- Tokens
- 727 tok
Google
Release: 2026-05-08
Tested on: 2026-07-16 22:51
google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite::none
Summary
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite scores 6.1 on AI BENCHY and ranks #147. It has 10.0 reliability, a 50.0% pass rate, $0.046 total cost, and 1.75s average response time.
What makes Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite unique: It is notably fast compared with similar models.
Identity note
Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview was the preview version of Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite.
6.1
Consistency
8.6
10.0
$0.046
Total Output Tokens
10,723
Total Input Tokens
118,050
Input Price
$0.250 / 1M
Output Price
$1.500 / 1M
Flaky tests
4
Flaky tests had mixed outcomes across runs (at least one pass and one fail).
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
Run history
| Tested on | Score | Reliability | Tests Correct | Total Cost | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-07-16 22:51 New test added | 6.1 | 10.0 | $0.046 | Current run | |
| 2026-06-04 13:59 New test added | 6.4 | 10.0 | $0.013 | Compare | |
| 2026-05-22 00:26 Suite changed | 6.6 | 10.0 | $0.013 | Compare | |
| 2026-05-08 12:01 Initial run | 6.9 | 10.0 | $0.011 | Compare |
This run used a different benchmark suite. Keep suite changes in mind when reading historical movement.
Run comparison
| Run | Benchmark coverage | Score | Consistency | Reliability | Tests Correct | Flaky tests | Total Output Tokens | Total Input Tokens | Total Cost | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-07-16 22:51 · Current run | 22/22 tests · 66/66 attempts | 6.1 | 8.6 | 10.0 | 9/22 | 4 | 10,723 | 118,050 | $0.046 | 1.75s |
| 2026-05-22 00:26 · Suite changed | 20/20 tests · 60/60 attempts | 6.6 | 8.5 | 10.0 | 9/20 | 4 | 2,478 | 0 | $0.013 | 1.09s |
| Difference | — | -0.4 | +0.1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | +8245 | +118050 | +$0.034 | +665ms |
Benchmark coverage differs: 22/22 tests · 66/66 attempts (Target: 3 repeats per test) versus 20/20 tests · 60/60 attempts (Target: 3 repeats per test). Totals and repeat-sensitive metrics are not directly comparable.
These two runs used different benchmark suites, so the deltas reflect both model changes and suite changes.
Price History
Historical pricing data for this model from OpenRouter.
| Date | Input Price | Output Price |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-04 15:40 | $0.250 / 1M | $1.500 / 1M |
Charts
Choose the first model, then click a second model to open a side-by-side page.
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Quick Compare
Gemini 3.1 Flash LitenonevsQwen3.7 FlashnoneGemini 3.1 Flash LitenonevsInklinglowGemini 3.1 Flash Litenonevsgpt-oss-120bmediumGemini 3.1 Flash LitenonevsQwen3.6 FlashnoneGemini 3.1 Flash LitenonevsGemini 3.1 Flash LiteminimalGemini 3.1 Flash LitenonevsQwen3.5-FlashnoneGemini 3.1 Flash LitenonevsQwen3.5-35B-A3BmediumGemini 3.1 Flash LitenonevsQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20noneGemini 3.1 Flash LitenonevsGemini 2.5 FlashnoneGemini 3.1 Flash LitenonevsQwen3.5-35B-A3Bnone
Category Breakdown
| Category | Score | Consistency | Tests Correct |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anti-AI Tricks | 7.5 | 8.4 | |
| Coding | 5.5 | 10.0 | |
| Combined | 3.0 | 10.0 | |
| Data parsing and extraction | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Domain specific | 2.9 | 7.2 | |
| General Intelligence | 4.0 | 10.0 | |
| Instructions following | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Puzzle Solving | 6.3 | 4.8 | |
| Tool Calling | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Trivia | 3.0 | 10.0 |