AI BENCHY
Advertise here
#144

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite

Google Release: 2026-05-08 Tested on: 2026-07-16 22:51 google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite::minimal
(high) (medium) (low) (minimal) (none)

Summary

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite scores 6.1 on AI BENCHY and ranks #144. It has 10.0 reliability, a 51.5% pass rate, $0.047 total cost, and 1.86s average response time.

What makes Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite unique: It stands out most in Anti-AI Tricks, where it ranks #3, while Domain specific is its weakest area at #14. It is notably fast compared with similar models.

Score

6.1

Consistency

8.9

Reliability

10.0

Total Cost (Current Price)

$0.047

Total Output Tokens

11,118

Total Input Tokens

119,065

Input Price

$0.250 / 1M

Output Price

$1.500 / 1M

Tests Correct

Wrong Tests: 12

Attempt pass rate: 51.5%

Flaky tests

3

Flaky tests had mixed outcomes across runs (at least one pass and one fail).

Response Time (avg)

1.86s

Response Time (max): 12.97s

Response Time (total): 40.88s

Wrong answer: 8 Did not follow instructions: 3 No answer: 1

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#144 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite

minimal
Cost
$0.001
Time
3.7s
Tokens
635 tok

Run history

Tested on Score Reliability Tests Correct Total Cost Compare
2026-07-16 22:51 New test added 6.1 10.0 $0.047 Current run
2026-06-04 13:59 New test added 6.4 10.0 $0.013 Compare
2026-05-22 00:26 Suite changed 6.7 10.0 $0.013 Compare
2026-05-08 12:00 Initial run 7.0 10.0 $0.012 Compare

This run used a different benchmark suite. Keep suite changes in mind when reading historical movement.

Run comparison

RunBenchmark coverageScoreConsistencyReliabilityTests CorrectFlaky testsTotal Output TokensTotal Input TokensTotal CostResponse Time (avg)
2026-07-16 22:51 · Current run22/22 tests · 66/66 attempts6.18.910.010/22311,118119,065$0.0471.86s
2026-05-08 12:00 · Initial run18/18 tests · 54/54 attempts7.08.610.010/1832,4480$0.0121.44s
Difference—-0.9+0.30.000+8670+119065+$0.036+414ms

Benchmark coverage differs: 22/22 tests · 66/66 attempts (Target: 3 repeats per test) versus 18/18 tests · 54/54 attempts (Target: 3 repeats per test). Totals and repeat-sensitive metrics are not directly comparable.

These two runs used different benchmark suites, so the deltas reflect both model changes and suite changes.

Price History

Historical pricing data for this model from OpenRouter.

Date Input Price Output Price
2026-06-04 15:40 $0.250 / 1M $1.500 / 1M

Charts

Choose the first model, then click a second model to open a side-by-side page.

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Quick Compare

Gemini 3.1 Flash LiteminimalvsQwen3.5-35B-A3BmediumGemini 3.1 Flash Liteminimalvsgpt-oss-120bmediumGemini 3.1 Flash LiteminimalvsGemini 2.5 FlashnoneGemini 3.1 Flash LiteminimalvsQwen3.7 FlashnoneGemini 3.1 Flash LiteminimalvsGPT-5.6 LunalowGemini 3.1 Flash LiteminimalvsGemini 3.1 Flash LitenoneGemini 3.1 Flash LiteminimalvsSeed-2.0-LitenoneGemini 3.1 Flash LiteminimalvsInklinglowGemini 3.1 Flash LiteminimalvsGemma 4 31BnoneFree AvailableGemini 3.1 Flash LiteminimalvsQwen3.6 Flashnone

Category Breakdown

Category Score Consistency Tests Correct
Anti-AI Tricks 8.3 10.0
Coding 5.5 10.0
Combined 3.0 10.0
Data parsing and extraction 10.0 10.0
Domain specific 2.9 7.2
General Intelligence 4.0 10.0
Instructions following 10.0 10.0
Puzzle Solving 6.0 4.6
Tool Calling 10.0 10.0
Trivia 3.0 10.0

Compared models