#108 Seed-2.0-Lite
none- Cost
- $0.005
- Time
- 83.8s
- Tokens
- 2,311 tok
Bytedance Seed
Release: 2026-02-14
Tested on: 2026-06-04 14:17
bytedance-seed/seed-2.0-lite::none
~200B total (~20B active)MoEClosedEstimated
(medium)
(none)
Summary
Seed-2.0-Lite scores 5.8 on AI BENCHY and ranks #108. It has 10.0 reliability, a 46.0% pass rate, $0.019 total cost, and 2.49s average response time.
What makes Seed-2.0-Lite unique: Its total benchmark cost is unusually low for its score range. It is notably fast compared with similar models.
Model facts
Researched on 2026-08-12
- Parameters
- ~200B total (~20B active)
- Architecture
- MoE
- Availability
- Closed
- License
- -
Best estimate from public evidence; the vendor did not disclose every value. Seed2 tiers are public, but their parameter counts are not.
5.8
Consistency
8.4
10.0
$0.019
Total Output Tokens
3,259
Total Input Tokens
46,573
Input Price
$0.250 / 1M
Output Price
$2.000 / 1M
Flaky tests
4
Flaky tests had mixed outcomes across runs (at least one pass and one fail).
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
Run history
| Tested on | Score | Reliability | Tests Correct | Total Cost | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-14 02:57 Re-test | 6.2 | 10.0 | $0.066 | Compare | |
| 2026-07-16 23:10 New test added | 6.2 | 10.0 | $0.066 | Compare | |
| 2026-06-04 14:17 New test added | 5.8 | 10.0 | $0.019 | Current run | |
| 2026-05-22 00:33 Suite changed | 5.9 | 10.0 | $0.018 | Compare | |
| 2026-04-11 01:44 First recorded run | 6.2 | N/A | $0.016 | Compare |
This run used a different benchmark suite. Keep suite changes in mind when reading historical movement.
Run comparison
| Run | Benchmark coverage | Score | Consistency | Reliability | Tests Correct | Flaky tests | Total Output Tokens | Total Input Tokens | Total Cost | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-04 14:17 · New test added | 63/63 attempts | 5.8 | 8.4 | 10.0 | 8/21 | 4 | 3,259 | 46,573 | $0.019 | 2.49s |
| 2026-05-22 00:33 · Suite changed | 60/60 attempts | 5.9 | 7.9 | 10.0 | 8/20 | 5 | 3,164 | 0 | $0.018 | 2.44s |
| Difference | — | -0.1 | +0.5 | 0.0 | 0 | -1 | +95 | +46573 | +$0.001 | +53ms |
Benchmark coverage differs: 63/63 attempts (Target: 3 repeats per test) versus 60/60 attempts (Target: 3 repeats per test). Totals and repeat-sensitive metrics are not directly comparable.
These two runs used different benchmark suites, so the deltas reflect both model changes and suite changes.
Price History
Historical pricing data for this model from OpenRouter.
| Date | Input Price | Output Price |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-04 14:42 | $0.250 / 1M | $2.000 / 1M |
Charts
Choose the first model, then click a second model to open a side-by-side page.
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Quick Compare
Seed-2.0-LitenonevsRing-2.6-1TmediumSeed-2.0-LitenonevsGemma 4 31BmediumFree AvailableSeed-2.0-LitenonevsLing-3.0-flashhighSeed-2.0-LitenonevsGPT-5.6 LunalowSeed-2.0-LitenonevsMiMo-V2.5mediumSeed-2.0-LitenonevsClaude Sonnet 5noneSeed-2.0-LitenonevsLongCat 2.0noneSeed-2.0-LitenonevsGemini 3.1 Flash LiteminimalSeed-2.0-LitenonevsDots 3 Note PreviewhighFree AvailableSeed-2.0-LitenonevsQwen3.5-35B-A3Bmedium
Category Breakdown
| Category | Score | Consistency | Tests Correct |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anti-AI Tricks | 3.0 | 5.9 | |
| Coding | 5.6 | 10.0 | |
| Combined | 3.0 | 10.0 | |
| Data parsing and extraction | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Domain specific | 3.6 | 7.2 | |
| General Intelligence | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Instructions following | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Puzzle Solving | 5.3 | 7.2 | |
| Tool Calling | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Trivia | 3.0 | 10.0 |