Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5 vs ByteDance Seed: Seed-2.0-Lite

Claude Sonnet 5 leads on average score with 6.3 vs 6.2. Seed-2.0-Lite has the lower benchmark cost at $0.066 vs $0.548. Seed-2.0-Lite is faster at 4.40s vs 6.04s, with pass rates of 45.5% vs 43.9%.

Recommended modelSeed-2.0-LiteIts score stays close to the best score here (6.2 vs 6.3), while costing about 8.4x less than Claude Sonnet 5.

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Metric Claude Sonnet 5 Claude Sonnet 5 none Release: 2026-06-30 Seed-2.0-Lite Seed-2.0-Lite none Release: 2026-02-14
Score 6.3 6.2
Rank #123 #127
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.7 8.5
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 45.5% 43.9%
Flaky tests 4 4
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 6.840 0.814
Total Cost $0.548 $0.066
Input Price $2.000 / 1M $0.250 / 1M
Output Price $10.000 / 1M $2.000 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 161,035 142,197
Output Tokens 22,511 14,746
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 6.04s 4.40s
Response Time (max) 33.39s 44.58s
Response Time (total) 132.85s 96.84s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#123 Claude Sonnet 5

none
Cost
$0.061
Time
53.7s
Tokens
6,172 tok

#127 Seed-2.0-Lite

none
Cost
$0.005
Time
83.8s
Tokens
2,311 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Sonnet 5 4.6 7.9 22.2% 1 3.67s 10,590 1,864 0
Seed-2.0-Lite 5.6 10.0 33.3% 0 2.83s 8,215 410 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair