#203 Trinity Large Thinking
medium- Cost
- $0.016
- Time
- 75.9s
- Tokens
- 19,401 tok
Arcee AI
Release: 2026-07-28
Tested on: 2026-08-14 04:05
arcee-ai/trinity-large-thinking::medium
398B total (13B active)MoEWeights available
Summary
Trinity Large Thinking scores 6.1 on AI BENCHY and ranks #203. It has 10.0 reliability, a 48.5% pass rate, $0.756 total cost, and 85.44s average response time.
What makes Trinity Large Thinking unique: It stands out most in Coding, where it ranks #1, while Combined is its weakest area at #16. It uses unusually many reasoning tokens, which can help explain its slower or more expensive runs.
Model facts
Researched on 2026-08-12
- Parameters
- 398B total (13B active)
- Architecture
- MoE
- Availability
- Weights available
- License
- OpenMDW
6.1
Consistency
7.9
10.0
Total Output Tokens
1,016,785
Total Input Tokens
118,486
Input Price
$0.250 / 1M
Output Price
$0.800 / 1M
Flaky tests
6
Flaky tests had mixed outcomes across runs (at least one pass and one fail).
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
Run history
| Tested on | Score | Reliability | Tests Correct | Total Cost | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-14 04:05 Re-test | 6.1 | 10.0 | $0.756 ↓ | Current run | |
| 2026-07-28 10:51 Initial run | 6.0 | 10.0 | $0.792 | Compare |
This run used a different benchmark suite. Keep suite changes in mind when reading historical movement.
Run comparison
| Run | Benchmark coverage | Score | Consistency | Reliability | Tests Correct | Flaky tests | Total Output Tokens | Total Input Tokens | Total Cost | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-14 04:05 · Current run | 66/66 attempts | 6.1 | 7.9 | 10.0 | 8/22 | 6 | 1,016,785 | 118,486 | $0.756 | 85.44s |
| 2026-07-28 10:51 · Initial run | 66/66 attempts | 6.0 | 7.6 | 10.0 | 7/22 | 7 | 1,002,646 | 118,477 | $0.792 | 84.96s |
| Difference | — | +0.1 | +0.3 | 0.0 | +1 | -1 | +14139 | +9 | -$0.036 | +481ms |
These two runs used different benchmark suites, so the deltas reflect both model changes and suite changes.
Price History
Historical pricing data for this model from OpenRouter.
| Date | Input Price | Output Price |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-14 12:51 | $0.220 / 1M | $0.850 / 1M |
| 2026-09-02 00:25 | $0.250 / 1M | $0.800 / 1M |
Charts
Choose the first model, then click a second model to open a side-by-side page.
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Quick Compare
Trinity Large ThinkingmediumvsInklinglowTrinity Large ThinkingmediumvsQwen3.6 FlashnoneTrinity Large ThinkingmediumvsQwen3.5-FlashmediumTrinity Large ThinkingmediumvsGemma 4 31BnoneFree AvailableTrinity Large ThinkingmediumvsGemini 3.1 Flash LitenoneTrinity Large ThinkingmediumvsQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20noneTrinity Large ThinkingmediumvsQwen3.7 FlashnoneTrinity Large ThinkingmediumvsNemotron 3 UltranoneFree AvailableTrinity Large Thinkingmediumvsgpt-oss-120bmediumTrinity Large ThinkingmediumvsTrinity Large Thinkinglow
Category Breakdown
| Category | Score | Consistency | Tests Correct |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anti-AI Tricks | 6.8 | 9.8 | |
| Coding | 7.5 | 10.0 | |
| Combined | 2.9 | 6.0 | |
| Data parsing and extraction | 6.3 | 5.8 | |
| Domain specific | 5.3 | 7.2 | |
| General Intelligence | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Instructions following | 4.4 | 6.9 | |
| Puzzle Solving | 5.2 | 5.4 | |
| Tool Calling | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Trivia | 3.0 | 10.0 |