- Peringkat
- #139
- Total token output
- 225,904
- Waktu respons (rata-rata)
- 44.21s
- Total Biaya
- $0.741
Grok 4.3 (medium) vs GLM 5.1 (medium)
Skor rata-rata hampir imbang di 7.0 vs 7.0. GLM 5.1 (medium) memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.727 vs $0.741. Grok 4.3 (medium) lebih cepat di 44.21s vs 58.80s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 66.7% vs 65.2%.
Model yang Dibandingkan
- Peringkat
- #142
- Total token output
- 215,889
- Waktu respons (rata-rata)
- 58.80s
- Total Biaya
- $0.727
Model yang direkomendasikan
Grok 4.3 (medium)
It has the strongest score in this comparison (7.0) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across all 2 models.
Perbandingan terperinci
| Metrik | Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 medium | GLM 5.1 GLM 5.1 medium |
|---|---|---|
| Skor | 7.0 | 7.0 |
| Peringkat | #139 | #142 |
| Keandalan | 10.0 | 8.1 |
| Konsistensi | 8.2 | 8.4 |
| Percobaan | 66/66 | 66/66 |
| Tes benar | ||
| Tingkat lulus per percobaan | 66.7% | 65.2% |
| Tes tidak stabil | 5 | 4 |
| Total Run | 66 | 66 |
| Biaya per hasil | 6.168 | 6.923 |
| Total Biaya | $0.741 | $0.727 |
| Harga input | $1.250 / 1M | $0.966 / 1M |
| Harga output | $2.500 / 1M | $3.036 / 1M |
| Total token input | 140,244 | 82,592 |
| Token output | 13,739 | 16,089 |
| Token penalaran | 212,165 | 199,800 |
| Waktu respons (rata-rata) | 44.21s | 58.80s |
| Waktu respons (maks) | 216.69s | 308.75s |
| Waktu respons (total) | 972.64s | 1234.72s |
| Parameter | ~1.5T total (~150B aktif) | 744B total (40B aktif) |
| Ketersediaan | Tertutup | Sumber terbuka |
Showcase generasi model
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#139 SpaceXAI: Grok 4.3
medium- Biaya
- $0.009
- Waktu
- 19.0s
- Token
- 3,661 tok
#142 GLM 5.1
medium
Reached the allocated time limit (300 seconds) without receiving showcase output.
- Biaya
- $0.000
- Waktu
- 300.0s
- Token
- 0 tok
Model teratas berdasarkan skor
Skor vs Total Biaya
Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Total token output
Skor vs Total token output
Rincian Kategori
Perbandingan Cepat
Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan
GPT-5.5nonevsGLM 5.1mediumGPT-5.6 SolnonevsGrok 4.3mediumMercury 2.5highvsGrok 4.3mediumGPT-5.6 SolnonevsGLM 5.1mediumGPT-5.5nonevsGrok 4.3mediumSolar Pro 4highvsGrok 4.3mediumClaude Fable 5.1lowvsGLM 5.1mediumMercury 2.5highvsGLM 5.1mediumSeed-2.0-CodehighvsGLM 5.1mediumStep 3.7 FlashlowvsGrok 4.3mediumMuse Glimmer 30BlowvsGrok 4.3mediumSolar Pro 4highvsGLM 5.1medium