Navigasi
Advertise here

Model yang Dibandingkan

Perbandingan benchmark Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B (low) vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B (high) vs Grok 4.6 (high): Grok 4.6 (high) unggul pada Skor dengan 9.3. Grok 4.6 (high) unggul pada Keandalan dengan 10.0. Grok 4.6 (high) memiliki Total Biaya terendah di $1.908. Grok 4.6 (high) paling cepat di 84.15s.

Benchmark dihasilkan dari suite pengujian AI BENCHY pada: 2026-09-24

Model yang Dibandingkan

Peringkat
#78
Total token output
495,541
Waktu respons (rata-rata)
118.97s
Total Biaya
$2.672
Peringkat
#133
Total token output
456,028
Waktu respons (rata-rata)
120.59s
Total Biaya
$2.357
Peringkat
#19
Total token output
282,217
Waktu respons (rata-rata)
84.15s
Total Biaya
$1.908
Model yang direkomendasikan Grok 4.6 (high)

It has the strongest score in this comparison (9.3) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across all 3 models.

Perbandingan terperinci

Metrik Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B low Rilis: 2026-08-12 Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B high Rilis: 2026-08-12 Grok 4.6 Grok 4.6 high Rilis: 2026-08-12
Skor 8.1 7.4 9.3
Peringkat #78 #133 #19
Keandalan 9.4 9.4 10.0
Konsistensi 9.2 8.3 10.0
Percobaan 66/66 66/66 66/66
Tes benar
Tingkat lulus per percobaan 72.7% 74.2% 86.4%
Tes tidak stabil 2 4 0
Total Run 66 66 66
Biaya per hasil 17.812 16.832 10.042
Total Biaya $2.672 $2.357 $1.908
Harga input $2.000 / 1M $2.000 / 1M $2.000 / 1M
Harga output $6.000 / 1M $6.000 / 1M $6.000 / 1M
Total token input 113,279 108,931 107,275
Token output 121,045 112,801 5,094
Token penalaran 374,496 343,227 277,123
Waktu respons (rata-rata) 118.97s 120.59s 84.15s
Waktu respons (maks) 534.21s 532.28s 618.49s
Waktu respons (total) 2617.41s 2653.05s 1851.26s
Parameter 2.4T total (95B aktif) 2.4T total (95B aktif) ~1.7T total (~170B aktif)
Ketersediaan Bobot tersedia Bobot tersedia Tertutup

Showcase generasi model

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#78 Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B

low
Biaya
$0.100
Waktu
193.2s
Token
16,767 tok

#133 Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B

high
Reached the allocated time limit (600 seconds) without receiving showcase output.
Biaya
$0.000
Waktu
600.0s
Token
0 tok

#19 SpaceXAI: Grok 4.6

high
Biaya
$0.107
Waktu
265.1s
Token
18,001 tok

Model teratas berdasarkan skor

Skor vs Total Biaya

Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Total token output

Skor vs Total token output

Rincian Kategori

Pemrograman Skor Konsistensi Tingkat lulus per percobaan Tes tidak stabil Tes benar Waktu respons (rata-rata) Token input Token output Token penalaran
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B 7.8 9.3 66.7% 0 172.53s 6,716 21,405 57,399
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B 5.9 6.3 55.6% 1 160.52s 6,399 3,310 48,078
Grok 4.6 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 102.20s 9,579 379 51,829

Perbandingan Cepat

Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan

GPT-5.5lowvsGrok 4.6highGPT-5 MinimediumvsQwen3.8 2.4T A95BlowMuse Glimmer 30BxhighvsQwen3.8 2.4T A95BlowQwen3.8 2.4T A95BhighvsMiMo-V2.6-FlashmediumQwen3.8 2.4T A95BhighvsGrok 4.6lowGemini 3 Flash PreviewlowvsQwen3.8 2.4T A95BhighLongCat 2.0mediumvsQwen3.8 2.4T A95BhighClaude Opus 5.5lowvsGrok 4.6highGPT-6 AstramediumvsGrok 4.6highGPT-5.6 SolmediumvsGrok 4.6highGPT-6 SolmediumvsGrok 4.6highQwen3.8 2.4T A95BlowvsGrok 4.7medium