#38 Qwen3.6 Plus
medium- Biaya
- $0.024
- Waktu
- 219.0s
- Token
- 12,235 tok
AI BENCHY Compare
Qwen: Qwen3.6 Plus vs StepFun: Step 3.7 Flash
Ringkasan
Qwen3.6 Plus (medium) unggul dalam skor rata-rata dengan 7.8 vs 7.7. Qwen3.6 Plus (medium) memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.294 vs $0.341. Step 3.7 Flash (low) lebih cepat di 15.74s vs 30.70s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 69.8% vs 68.3%.
Model yang direkomendasikanStep 3.7 Flash (low)Its score stays close to the best score here (7.7 vs 7.8), while responding about 1.9x faster than Qwen3.6 Plus (medium).
Benchmark dihasilkan dari suite pengujian AI BENCHY pada: 2026-07-14
| Metrik | Qwen3.6 Plus Qwen3.6 Plus medium | Step 3.7 Flash Step 3.7 Flash low |
|---|---|---|
| Skor | 7.8 | 7.7 |
| Peringkat | #38 | #51 |
| Keandalan | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| Konsistensi | 9.3 | 8.4 |
| Tes benar | ||
| Tingkat lulus per percobaan | 69.8% | 68.3% |
| Tes tidak stabil | 2 | 4 |
| Total Run | 63 | 63 |
| Biaya per hasil | 0.831 | 2.840 |
| Total Biaya | $0.294 | $0.341 |
| Harga input | $0.325 / 1M | $0.200 / 1M |
| Harga output | $1.950 / 1M | $1.150 / 1M |
| Total token input | 41,565 | 40,101 |
| Token output | 1,853 | 289,325 |
| Token penalaran | 141,973 | 0 |
| Waktu respons (rata-rata) | 30.70s | 15.74s |
| Waktu respons (maks) | 201.68s | 124.75s |
| Waktu respons (total) | 613.99s | 330.63s |
Showcase generasi
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#51 Step 3.7 Flash
low
SVG tidak valid
- Biaya
- $0.004
- Waktu
- 25.3s
- Token
- 3,072 tok
Model teratas berdasarkan skor
Skor vs Total Biaya
Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Total token output
Skor vs Total token output
Rincian Kategori
| Pemrograman | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3.6 Plus | 6.1 | 7.8 | 44.4% | 1 | 153.12s | 7,098 | 58 | 50,586 | |
| Step 3.7 Flash | 8.2 | 7.2 | 88.9% | 1 | 9.46s | 7,437 | 18,685 | 0 |
Perbandingan Cepat
Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan
GPT-5.6 LunahighvsStep 3.7 FlashlowClaude Opus 4.6mediumvsStep 3.7 FlashlowStep 3.7 FlashlowvsGrok 4.3mediumKAT-Coder-Pro V2.5highvsStep 3.7 FlashlowQwen3.6 PlusmediumvsGrok 4.5lowQwen3.5-122B-A10BmediumvsStep 3.7 FlashlowKimi K2.6mediumTersedia gratisvsStep 3.7 FlashlowGemini 3.1 Flash LitemediumvsStep 3.7 FlashlowQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20mediumvsStep 3.7 FlashlowGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewmediumvsStep 3.7 FlashlowMiniMax M3mediumvsStep 3.7 FlashlowDeepSeek V4 ProhighvsStep 3.7 Flashlow