Navigasi
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Qwen: Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 Flash

Skor rata-rata hampir imbang di 6.1 vs 6.1. Qwen3.6 Flash memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.062 vs $0.122. Qwen3.6 Flash lebih cepat di 3.74s vs 13.56s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 43.9% vs 34.9%.

Model yang direkomendasikanQwen3.6 FlashIt has the best score here (6.1), while costing about 2.0x less than Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20.

Benchmark dihasilkan dari suite pengujian AI BENCHY pada: 2026-07-25

Metrik Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 none Rilis: 2026-04-20 Qwen3.6 Flash Qwen3.6 Flash none Rilis: 2026-04-20
Skor 6.1 6.1
Peringkat #137 #135
Keandalan 10.0 10.0
Konsistensi 8.7 9.6
Tes benar
Tingkat lulus per percobaan 43.9% 34.9%
Tes tidak stabil 4 1
Total Run 66 66
Biaya per hasil 1.636 0.935
Total Biaya $0.122 $0.062
Harga input $0.300 / 1M $0.188 / 1M
Harga output $1.800 / 1M $1.125 / 1M
Total token input 94,468 139,788
Token output 51,487 30,947
Token penalaran 0 0
Waktu respons (rata-rata) 13.56s 3.74s
Waktu respons (maks) 206.05s 48.79s
Waktu respons (total) 298.31s 82.38s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#137 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20

none
Biaya
$0.008
Waktu
77.0s
Token
4,369 tok

#135 Qwen3.6 Flash

none
Biaya
$0.005
Waktu
20.1s
Token
4,211 tok

Model teratas berdasarkan skor

Skor vs Total Biaya

Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Total token output

Skor vs Total token output

Rincian Kategori

Pemrograman Skor Konsistensi Tingkat lulus per percobaan Tes tidak stabil Tes benar Waktu respons (rata-rata) Token input Token output Token penalaran
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 3.9 7.8 11.1% 1 1.69s 7,913 480 0
Qwen3.6 Flash 5.4 10.0 33.3% 0 1.79s 6,488 889 0

Perbandingan Cepat

Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan