#108 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
medium- Biaya
- $0.009
- Waktu
- 71.4s
- Token
- 8,631 tok
AI BENCHY Compare
Ringkasan
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B (medium) unggul dalam skor rata-rata dengan 6.3 vs 6.1. Qwen3.5-Flash memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.005 vs $0.401. Qwen3.5-Flash lebih cepat di 3.58s vs 72.57s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 69.8% vs 39.7%.
Benchmark dihasilkan dari suite pengujian AI BENCHY pada: 2026-07-14
| Metrik | Qwen3.5-35B-A3B Qwen3.5-35B-A3B medium | Qwen3.5-Flash Qwen3.5-Flash none |
|---|---|---|
| Skor | 6.3 | 6.1 |
| Peringkat | #108 | #119 |
| Keandalan | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| Konsistensi | 7.5 | 9.7 |
| Tes benar | ||
| Tingkat lulus per percobaan | 69.8% | 39.7% |
| Tes tidak stabil | 6 | 1 |
| Total Run | 63 | 63 |
| Biaya per hasil | 5.162 | 0.075 |
| Total Biaya | $0.401 | $0.005 |
| Harga input | $0.140 / 1M | $0.065 / 1M |
| Harga output | $1.000 / 1M | $0.260 / 1M |
| Total token input | 42,196 | 46,439 |
| Token output | 40,630 | 4,276 |
| Token penalaran | 353,577 | 0 |
| Waktu respons (rata-rata) | 72.57s | 3.58s |
| Waktu respons (maks) | 409.98s | 27.18s |
| Waktu respons (total) | 1524.04s | 75.28s |
Showcase generasi
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
| Pemrograman | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3.5-35B-A3B | 5.9 | 9.3 | 33.3% | 0 | 206.65s | 4,106 | 23,844 | 111,462 | |
| Qwen3.5-Flash | 5.5 | 10.0 | 33.3% | 0 | 850ms | 7,913 | 519 | 0 |
Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan