- Peringkat
- #10
- Total token output
- 28,540
- Waktu respons (rata-rata)
- 10.15s
- Total Biaya
- $1.257
GPT-5.5 (low) vs GLM 5.2 (medium)
GPT-5.5 (low) unggul dalam skor rata-rata dengan 9.3 vs 7.8. GLM 5.2 (medium) memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.224 vs $1.257. GPT-5.5 (low) lebih cepat di 10.15s vs 23.28s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 86.4% vs 80.3%.
- Peringkat
- #65
- Total token output
- 61,761
- Waktu respons (rata-rata)
- 23.28s
- Total Biaya
- $0.224
Model yang direkomendasikan
GPT-5.5 (low)
It has the best score here (9.3), while responding about 2.3x faster than GLM 5.2 (medium).
Perbandingan terperinci
| Metrik | GPT-5.5 GPT-5.5 low | GLM 5.2 GLM 5.2 medium |
|---|---|---|
| Skor | 9.3 | 7.8 |
| Peringkat | #10 | #65 |
| Keandalan | 10.0 | 9.5 |
| Konsistensi | 10.0 | 8.0 |
| Percobaan | 66/66 | 63/66 |
| Tes benar | ||
| Tingkat lulus per percobaan | 86.4% | 80.3% |
| Tes tidak stabil | 0 | 4 |
| Total Run | 66 | 63 |
| Biaya per hasil | 6.614 | 2.159 |
| Total Biaya | $1.257 | $0.224 |
| Harga input | $5.000 / 1M | $0.966 / 1M |
| Harga output | $30.000 / 1M | $3.036 / 1M |
| Total token input | 80,067 | 37,199 |
| Token output | 5,378 | 12,261 |
| Token penalaran | 23,162 | 49,500 |
| Waktu respons (rata-rata) | 10.15s | 23.28s |
| Waktu respons (maks) | 56.19s | 101.36s |
| Waktu respons (total) | 223.24s | 488.94s |
| Parameter | ~1.5T total (~100B aktif) | 744B total (40B aktif) |
| Ketersediaan | Tertutup | Sumber terbuka |
Showcase generasi model
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#10 GPT-5.5
low- Biaya
- $0.068
- Waktu
- 37.0s
- Token
- 2,339 tok
#65 GLM 5.2
medium- Biaya
- $0.041
- Waktu
- 195.8s
- Token
- 9,287 tok
Model teratas berdasarkan skor
Skor vs Total Biaya
Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Total token output
Skor vs Total token output
Rincian Kategori
Perbandingan Cepat
Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan
GPT-5.5lowvsGrok 4.6highQwen3.8 27BlowvsGLM 5.2mediumGPT-5.2 ChatnonevsGLM 5.2mediumGemini 3.7 FlashmediumvsGPT-5.5lowGemini 3.5 FlashhighvsGPT-5.5lowKimi K3maxvsGLM 5.2mediumClaude Opus 4.8lowvsGLM 5.2mediumGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewmediumvsGPT-5.5lowQwen3.7 FlashhighvsGLM 5.2mediumGPT-5.6 TerrahighvsGLM 5.2mediumClaude Opus 5highvsGPT-5.5lowSeed-2.0-CodelowvsGLM 5.2medium