Navigasi
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

OpenAI: GPT-5.5 vs Qwen: Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20

GPT-5.5 (low) unggul dalam skor rata-rata dengan 9.3 vs 6.1. Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.122 vs $1.253. GPT-5.5 (low) lebih cepat di 10.13s vs 13.56s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 86.4% vs 43.9%.

Model yang direkomendasikanGPT-5.5 (low)It has the strongest score in this comparison (9.3) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across all 2 models.

Benchmark dihasilkan dari suite pengujian AI BENCHY pada: 2026-07-25

Metrik GPT-5.5 GPT-5.5 low Rilis: 2026-04-24 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 none Rilis: 2026-04-20
Skor 9.3 6.1
Peringkat #9 #137
Keandalan 10.0 10.0
Konsistensi 10.0 8.7
Tes benar
Tingkat lulus per percobaan 86.4% 43.9%
Tes tidak stabil 0 4
Total Run 66 66
Biaya per hasil 6.594 1.636
Total Biaya $1.253 $0.122
Harga input $5.000 / 1M $0.300 / 1M
Harga output $30.000 / 1M $1.800 / 1M
Total token input 80,058 94,468
Token output 5,378 51,487
Token penalaran 23,040 0
Waktu respons (rata-rata) 10.13s 13.56s
Waktu respons (maks) 56.19s 206.05s
Waktu respons (total) 222.82s 298.31s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#9 GPT-5.5

low
Biaya
$0.068
Waktu
37.0s
Token
2,339 tok

#137 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20

none
Biaya
$0.008
Waktu
77.0s
Token
4,369 tok

Model teratas berdasarkan skor

Skor vs Total Biaya

Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Total token output

Skor vs Total token output

Rincian Kategori

Pemrograman Skor Konsistensi Tingkat lulus per percobaan Tes tidak stabil Tes benar Waktu respons (rata-rata) Token input Token output Token penalaran
GPT-5.5 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 15.04s 7,302 423 6,402
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 3.9 7.8 11.1% 1 1.69s 7,913 480 0

Perbandingan Cepat

Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan