- Peringkat
- #64
- Total token output
- 71,252
- Waktu respons (rata-rata)
- 28.51s
- Total Biaya
- $1.182
GPT-5.2 (medium) vs Grok 4.5 (medium)
Grok 4.5 (medium) unggul dalam skor rata-rata dengan 8.5 vs 8.4. GPT-5.2 (medium) memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $1.182 vs $2.042. GPT-5.2 (medium) lebih cepat di 28.51s vs 68.59s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 72.7% vs 83.3%.
Model yang Dibandingkan
- Peringkat
- #60
- Total token output
- 299,460
- Waktu respons (rata-rata)
- 68.59s
- Total Biaya
- $2.042
Model yang direkomendasikan
GPT-5.2 (medium)
Its score stays close to the best score here (8.4 vs 8.5), while costing about 1.7x less than Grok 4.5 (medium).
Perbandingan terperinci
| Metrik | GPT-5.2 GPT-5.2 medium | Grok 4.5 Grok 4.5 medium |
|---|---|---|
| Skor | 8.4 | 8.5 |
| Peringkat | #64 | #60 |
| Keandalan | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| Konsistensi | 8.5 | 8.9 |
| Percobaan | 66/66 | 66/66 |
| Tes benar | ||
| Tingkat lulus per percobaan | 72.7% | 83.3% |
| Tes tidak stabil | 4 | 3 |
| Total Run | 66 | 66 |
| Biaya per hasil | 8.438 | 12.007 |
| Total Biaya | $1.182 | $2.042 |
| Harga input | $1.750 / 1M | $2.000 / 1M |
| Harga output | $14.000 / 1M | $6.000 / 1M |
| Total token input | 105,013 | 122,155 |
| Token output | 9,914 | 5,514 |
| Token penalaran | 61,338 | 293,946 |
| Waktu respons (rata-rata) | 28.51s | 68.59s |
| Waktu respons (maks) | 116.86s | 436.38s |
| Waktu respons (total) | 456.13s | 1508.91s |
| Parameter | ~1.2T total (~80B aktif) | ~1.7T total (~170B aktif) |
| Ketersediaan | Tertutup | Tertutup |
Showcase generasi model
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#64 GPT-5.2
medium- Biaya
- $0.047
- Waktu
- 49.2s
- Token
- 3,396 tok
#60 SpaceXAI: Grok 4.5
medium- Biaya
- $0.044
- Waktu
- 59.4s
- Token
- 7,512 tok
Model teratas berdasarkan skor
Skor vs Total Biaya
Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Total token output
Skor vs Total token output
Rincian Kategori
Perbandingan Cepat
Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan
GPT-5.2mediumvsQwen3.8 27BhighGPT-5.2mediumvsGrok 4.5lowDeepSeek V4.1 FlashhighvsGrok 4.5mediumDeepSeek V4.1 FlashlowvsGrok 4.5mediumMuse Spark 1.2lowvsGrok 4.5mediumGPT-5.2mediumvsInkling SmallhighGPT-5.2mediumvsGLM 5.3 FlashXmaxDeepSeek V4.1 FlashmaxvsGPT-5.2mediumMuse Spark 1.2lowvsGPT-5.2mediumQwen3.8 27BhighvsGrok 4.5mediumDeepSeek V4.1 FlashhighvsGPT-5.2mediumDeepSeek V4.1 FlashlowvsGPT-5.2medium