#27 GPT-5.2
medium- Biaya
- $0.047
- Waktu
- 49.2s
- Token
- 3,396 tok
OpenAI: GPT-5.2 vs xAI: Grok 4.5
GPT-5.2 (medium) unggul dalam skor rata-rata dengan 8.4 vs 8.3. GPT-5.2 (medium) memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.951 vs $1.928. GPT-5.2 (medium) lebih cepat di 22.62s vs 61.71s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 72.7% vs 78.8%.
Model yang direkomendasikanGPT-5.2 (medium)It has the best score here (8.4), while costing about 2.0x less than Grok 4.5 (medium).
Benchmark dihasilkan dari suite pengujian AI BENCHY pada: 2026-07-25
| Metrik | GPT-5.2 GPT-5.2 medium | Grok 4.5 Grok 4.5 medium |
|---|---|---|
| Skor | 8.4 | 8.3 |
| Peringkat | #27 | #28 |
| Keandalan | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| Konsistensi | 8.5 | 8.9 |
| Tes benar | ||
| Tingkat lulus per percobaan | 72.7% | 78.8% |
| Tes tidak stabil | 4 | 3 |
| Total Run | 66 | 66 |
| Biaya per hasil | 6.791 | 12.049 |
| Total Biaya | $0.951 | $1.928 |
| Harga input | $1.750 / 1M | $2.000 / 1M |
| Harga output | $14.000 / 1M | $6.000 / 1M |
| Total token input | 105,004 | 122,146 |
| Token output | 9,914 | 5,514 |
| Token penalaran | 44,868 | 275,053 |
| Waktu respons (rata-rata) | 22.62s | 61.71s |
| Waktu respons (maks) | 102.93s | 436.38s |
| Waktu respons (total) | 339.28s | 1357.56s |
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#28 xAI: Grok 4.5
medium- Biaya
- $0.044
- Waktu
- 59.4s
- Token
- 7,512 tok
Model teratas berdasarkan skor
Skor vs Total Biaya
Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Total token output
Skor vs Total token output
Rincian Kategori
Perbandingan Cepat
Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan
GPT-5.2mediumvsGrok 4.5lowMuse Spark 1.1lowvsGrok 4.5mediumMuse Spark 1.1lowvsGPT-5.2mediumClaude Opus 5lowvsGPT-5.2mediumMuse Spark 1.1highvsGrok 4.5mediumClaude Opus 5lowvsGrok 4.5mediumGemini 3.5 Flash-LitehighvsGrok 4.5mediumInklinghighvsGrok 4.5mediumGPT-5.2 ChatnonevsGrok 4.5mediumGrok 4.5mediumvsGLM 5.2highMuse Spark 1.1highvsGPT-5.2mediumGemini 3.5 Flash-LitehighvsGPT-5.2medium