Navigasi
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 vs Qwen: Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20

Skor rata-rata hampir imbang di 7.2 vs 7.2. Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 (medium) memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.317 vs $1.036. Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 (medium) lebih cepat di 46.36s vs 109.98s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 63.6% vs 63.6%.

Model yang direkomendasikanQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 (medium)It has the best score here (7.2), while costing about 3.3x less than Kimi K2.6 (medium).

Benchmark dihasilkan dari suite pengujian AI BENCHY pada: 2026-07-20

Metrik Kimi K2.6 Kimi K2.6 medium Rilis: 2026-04-20 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 medium Rilis: 2026-04-20
Skor 7.2 7.2
Peringkat #68 #70
Keandalan 9.4 9.6
Konsistensi 8.3 9.0
Tes benar
Tingkat lulus per percobaan 63.6% 63.6%
Tes tidak stabil 4 2
Total Run 66 66
Biaya per hasil 9.821 3.023
Total Biaya $1.036 $0.317
Harga input $0.684 / 1M $0.300 / 1M
Harga output $3.420 / 1M $1.800 / 1M
Total token input 68,902 42,097
Token output 111,680 2,280
Token penalaran 279,860 166,613
Waktu respons (rata-rata) 109.98s 46.36s
Waktu respons (maks) 876.20s 189.38s
Waktu respons (total) 2309.56s 973.57s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#68 MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6

medium
Biaya
$0.013
Waktu
103.4s
Token
3,620 tok

#70 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20

medium
Biaya
$0.008
Waktu
76.7s
Token
4,355 tok

Model teratas berdasarkan skor

Skor vs Total Biaya

Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Total token output

Skor vs Total token output

Rincian Kategori

Pemrograman Skor Konsistensi Tingkat lulus per percobaan Tes tidak stabil Tes benar Waktu respons (rata-rata) Token input Token output Token penalaran
Kimi K2.6 5.7 8.6 33.3% 0 214.42s 2,925 9,970 77,189
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 6.2 8.7 33.3% 0 125.25s 7,630 308 58,682

Perbandingan Cepat

Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan