Navigasi
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Ring-2.6-1T (medium) vs Qwen3.6 Flash

Ring-2.6-1T (medium) unggul dalam skor rata-rata dengan 6.3 vs 6.1. Qwen3.6 Flash memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.062 vs $0.103. Qwen3.6 Flash lebih cepat di 3.74s vs 68.74s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 60.6% vs 34.9%.

Benchmark dihasilkan dari suite pengujian AI BENCHY pada: 2026-07-25

Peringkat
#119
Total token output
165,833
Waktu respons (rata-rata)
68.74s
Total Biaya
$0.103
Peringkat
#135
Total token output
30,947
Waktu respons (rata-rata)
3.74s
Total Biaya
$0.062
Model yang direkomendasikan Qwen3.6 Flash

Its score stays close to the best score here (6.1 vs 6.3), while costing about 1.7x less than Ring-2.6-1T (medium).

Perbandingan terperinci

Metrik Ring-2.6-1T Ring-2.6-1T medium Rilis: 2026-05-10 Qwen3.6 Flash Qwen3.6 Flash none Rilis: 2026-04-20
Skor 6.3 6.1
Peringkat #119 #135
Keandalan 10.0 10.0
Konsistensi 8.5 9.6
Tes benar
Tingkat lulus per percobaan 60.6% 34.9%
Tes tidak stabil 4 1
Total Run 66 66
Biaya per hasil 0.629 0.935
Total Biaya $0.103 $0.062
Harga input $0.075 / 1M $0.188 / 1M
Harga output $0.625 / 1M $1.125 / 1M
Total token input 113,604 139,788
Token output 123,079 30,947
Token penalaran 42,754 0
Waktu respons (rata-rata) 68.74s 3.74s
Waktu respons (maks) 304.19s 48.79s
Waktu respons (total) 1374.86s 82.38s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#119 Ring-2.6-1T

medium
Ring-2.6-1T is no longer available as a free model. It has transitioned to a paid model. Continue using it here: https://openrouter.ai/inclusionai/ring-2.6-1t
Biaya
$0.000
Waktu
0.1s
Token
0 tok

#135 Qwen3.6 Flash

none
Biaya
$0.005
Waktu
20.1s
Token
4,211 tok

Model teratas berdasarkan skor

Skor vs Total Biaya

Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Total token output

Skor vs Total token output

Rincian Kategori

Pemrograman Skor Konsistensi Tingkat lulus per percobaan Tes tidak stabil Tes benar Waktu respons (rata-rata) Token input Token output Token penalaran
Ring-2.6-1T 5.3 10.0 33.3% 0 59.65s 834 1,369 3,985
Qwen3.6 Flash 5.4 10.0 33.3% 0 1.79s 6,488 889 0

Perbandingan Cepat

Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan

Qwen3.6 FlashnonevsInklinglowgpt-oss-120bmediumvsQwen3.6 FlashnoneGPT-5 NanomediumvsQwen3.6 FlashnoneGemini 3.1 Flash LiteminimalvsQwen3.6 FlashnoneQwen3.6 FlashnonevsStep 3.5 FlashmediumRing-2.6-1TmediumvsLongCat 2.0noneClaude Sonnet 5nonevsRing-2.6-1TmediumRing-2.6-1TmediumvsQwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15noneGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewnonevsRing-2.6-1TmediumGPT-5.6 LunalowvsQwen3.6 FlashnoneGemini 3.1 Flash LitelowvsRing-2.6-1TmediumGemma 4 31BnoneTersedia gratisvsRing-2.6-1Tmedium