#2 Gemini 3 Flash Preview
medium- Biaya
- $0.010
- Waktu
- 17.9s
- Token
- 3,236 tok
AI BENCHY Compare
Ringkasan
Gemini 3 Flash Preview (medium) unggul dalam skor rata-rata dengan 9.6 vs 6.1. Qwen3.5-Flash memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.005 vs $0.667. Qwen3.5-Flash lebih cepat di 3.58s vs 18.64s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 98.4% vs 39.7%.
Benchmark dihasilkan dari suite pengujian AI BENCHY pada: 2026-07-14
| Metrik | Gemini 3 Flash Preview Gemini 3 Flash Preview medium | Qwen3.5-Flash Qwen3.5-Flash none |
|---|---|---|
| Skor | 9.6 | 6.1 |
| Peringkat | #2 | #119 |
| Keandalan | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| Konsistensi | 9.7 | 9.7 |
| Tes benar | ||
| Tingkat lulus per percobaan | 98.4% | 39.7% |
| Tes tidak stabil | 1 | 1 |
| Total Run | 63 | 63 |
| Biaya per hasil | 3.335 | 0.075 |
| Total Biaya | $0.667 | $0.005 |
| Harga input | $0.500 / 1M | $0.065 / 1M |
| Harga output | $3.000 / 1M | $0.260 / 1M |
| Total token input | 37,017 | 46,439 |
| Token output | 2,006 | 4,276 |
| Token penalaran | 214,153 | 0 |
| Waktu respons (rata-rata) | 18.64s | 3.58s |
| Waktu respons (maks) | 117.26s | 27.18s |
| Waktu respons (total) | 391.35s | 75.28s |
Showcase generasi
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
| Pemrograman | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 3 Flash Preview | 8.6 | 7.6 | 88.9% | 1 | 84.40s | 8,122 | 462 | 161,084 | |
| Qwen3.5-Flash | 5.5 | 10.0 | 33.3% | 0 | 850ms | 7,913 | 519 | 0 |
Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan