#68 Gemini 3 Flash Preview
low- Biaya
- $0.007
- Waktu
- 12.1s
- Token
- 2,289 tok
AI BENCHY Compare
Ringkasan
Gemini 3 Flash Preview (low) unggul dalam skor rata-rata dengan 7.4 vs 6.7. Gemini 3 Flash Preview (low) memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.111 vs $0.146. Gemini 3 Flash Preview (low) lebih cepat di 5.76s vs 18.08s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 79.4% vs 63.5%.
Benchmark dihasilkan dari suite pengujian AI BENCHY pada: 2026-07-14
| Metrik | Gemini 3 Flash Preview Gemini 3 Flash Preview low | Qwen3.6 35B A3B Qwen3.6 35B A3B medium |
|---|---|---|
| Skor | 7.4 | 6.7 |
| Peringkat | #68 | #93 |
| Keandalan | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| Konsistensi | 9.2 | 9.6 |
| Tes benar | ||
| Tingkat lulus per percobaan | 79.4% | 63.5% |
| Tes tidak stabil | 2 | 1 |
| Total Run | 63 | 63 |
| Biaya per hasil | 0.689 | 1.094 |
| Total Biaya | $0.111 | $0.146 |
| Harga input | $0.500 / 1M | $0.140 / 1M |
| Harga output | $3.000 / 1M | $1.000 / 1M |
| Total token input | 36,769 | 16,385 |
| Token output | 2,076 | 19,632 |
| Token penalaran | 28,518 | 130,219 |
| Waktu respons (rata-rata) | 5.76s | 18.08s |
| Waktu respons (maks) | 14.72s | 86.11s |
| Waktu respons (total) | 120.93s | 343.61s |
Showcase generasi
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
| Pemrograman | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 3 Flash Preview | 5.8 | 7.2 | 44.4% | 1 | 6.00s | 8,122 | 456 | 7,421 | |
| Qwen3.6 35B A3B | 7.7 | 10.0 | 66.7% | 0 | 50.55s | 5,051 | 7,929 | 37,223 |
Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan