Navigasi
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Thinking Machines: Inkling

Gemini 3.5 Flash (high) unggul dalam skor rata-rata dengan 9.5 vs 6.1. Inkling (low) memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.187 vs $1.976. Inkling (low) lebih cepat di 5.15s vs 15.07s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 93.9% vs 54.6%.

Model yang direkomendasikanGemini 3.5 Flash (high)It has the strongest score in this comparison (9.5) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across all 2 models.

Benchmark dihasilkan dari suite pengujian AI BENCHY pada: 2026-07-18

Metrik Gemini 3.5 Flash Gemini 3.5 Flash high Rilis: 2026-05-19 Inkling Inkling low Rilis: 2026-07-18
Skor 9.5 6.1
Peringkat #2 #119
Keandalan 10.0 9.9
Konsistensi 9.3 8.6
Tes benar
Tingkat lulus per percobaan 93.9% 54.6%
Tes tidak stabil 2 4
Total Run 66 66
Biaya per hasil 9.879 1.866
Total Biaya $1.976 $0.187
Harga input $1.500 / 1M $1.000 / 1M
Harga output $9.000 / 1M $4.050 / 1M
Total token input 107,137 109,884
Token output 8,777 8,579
Token penalaran 192,900 10,343
Waktu respons (rata-rata) 15.07s 5.15s
Waktu respons (maks) 145.92s 41.58s
Waktu respons (total) 331.48s 113.39s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#2 Gemini 3.5 Flash

high
Biaya
$0.208
Waktu
118.2s
Token
23,158 tok

#119 Thinking Machines: Inkling

low
Biaya
$0.002
Waktu
6.1s
Token
502 tok

Model teratas berdasarkan skor

Skor vs Total Biaya

Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Total token output

Skor vs Total token output

Rincian Kategori

Pemrograman Skor Konsistensi Tingkat lulus per percobaan Tes tidak stabil Tes benar Waktu respons (rata-rata) Token input Token output Token penalaran
Gemini 3.5 Flash 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 22.96s 8,118 456 47,129
Inkling 5.1 7.2 22.2% 1 8.71s 7,374 355 4,961

Perbandingan Cepat

Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan