Navigasi
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash vs OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna

Skor rata-rata hampir imbang di 7.7 vs 7.7. DeepSeek V4 Flash (high) memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.042 vs $1.017. GPT-5.6 Luna (high) lebih cepat di 18.68s vs 49.75s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 72.7% vs 72.7%.

Model yang direkomendasikanDeepSeek V4 Flash (high)It has the best score here (7.7), while costing about 24.3x less than GPT-5.6 Luna (high).

Benchmark dihasilkan dari suite pengujian AI BENCHY pada: 2026-07-22

Metrik DeepSeek V4 Flash DeepSeek V4 Flash high Rilis: 2026-04-24 GPT-5.6 Luna GPT-5.6 Luna high Rilis: 2026-07-09
Skor 7.7 7.7
Peringkat #49 #48
Keandalan 10.0 10.0
Konsistensi 8.2 8.9
Tes benar
Tingkat lulus per percobaan 72.7% 72.7%
Tes tidak stabil 5 3
Total Run 66 66
Biaya per hasil 0.402 6.780
Total Biaya $0.042 $1.017
Harga input $0.098 / 1M $1.000 / 1M
Harga output $0.196 / 1M $6.000 / 1M
Total token input 108,392 80,918
Token output 14,478 5,088
Token penalaran 153,687 150,910
Waktu respons (rata-rata) 49.75s 18.68s
Waktu respons (maks) 218.13s 111.09s
Waktu respons (total) 1094.41s 411.05s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#49 DeepSeek V4 Flash

high
Biaya
$0.003
Waktu
93.1s
Token
7,926 tok

#48 GPT-5.6 Luna

high
Biaya
$0.033
Waktu
34.2s
Token
5,484 tok

Model teratas berdasarkan skor

Skor vs Total Biaya

Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Total token output

Skor vs Total token output

Rincian Kategori

Pemrograman Skor Konsistensi Tingkat lulus per percobaan Tes tidak stabil Tes benar Waktu respons (rata-rata) Token input Token output Token penalaran
DeepSeek V4 Flash 7.8 10.0 66.7% 0 50.60s 7,279 395 34,862
GPT-5.6 Luna 5.5 4.7 55.6% 2 15.63s 7,302 510 17,746

Perbandingan Cepat

Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan